Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Marvin Howell, Director of Land Use Permitting and Planning for Hanson Aggregates <br />West, Inc., P. O. Box 639069, San Diego CA 92069, indicated he was here to listen to what the <br />community had to say about development of this parcel. He noted in his twenty years with <br />Hanson, he has seen their properties developed into all types of things, from parks like Mission <br />Trails in San Diego, to office complexes and housing developments. He described a project he <br />is currently working on to rehabilitate property along the San Diego River for public uses. He <br />encouraged people to develop a vision of how to use the amenities on this property when <br />considering development. <br /> <br />Carol Mahoney, representing Zone 7 Water Agency, indicated it is getting ready to <br />develop the chain of lakes master plan. She noted the Lake I buffer zone and wanted to have <br />the city take that property. She would like the General Plan to address that. She said there <br />were some drainage concerns and wanted that included in the master plan along with some <br />protections that any future use does not contaminate Cope Lake or surrounding streams. <br /> <br />Phil Blank asked for clarification about the buffer zone for Lake I. <br /> <br />Ms. Mahoney said there is an area adjacent to Martin Avenue near Lake I that Zone 7 <br />refers to as the buffer zone. That is an open space area that Zone 7 would like the city to take <br />over and maintain as an open space for the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Brian Arkin asked if it would be an advantage for the city to take over this area? <br /> <br />Ms. Mahoney said Zone 7 cannot operate the area as a park because it does not do <br />recreation. It usually partners with cities. She clarified Zone 7 would maintain ownership of <br />Lake I. She continued that the vision for the chain of lakes was to use Lake I for ground water <br />recharge and the rest of the lakes would be used either for recharge, water storage, and Cope <br />Lake is for flood water retention until a storm passes. It is expected the master plan would be <br />completed in 2009. <br /> <br />Steve Brozosky asked how much control the city would have for recreational use of the <br />lakes and whether the East Bay Regional Park District would be involved? <br /> <br />Ms. Mahoney indicated Shadow Cliffs is not a part of the chain of lakes, which is why <br />East Bay Regional Park District operates it. Zone 7 said there are options for recreation but <br />noted there are safety issues for some of the lakes, such as steep slopes. Cope Lake has <br />recreational potential and that will be addressed in the master plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky asked how much property does Zone 7 own around the lakes? In other <br />words, how close could development occur? <br /> <br />Ms. Mahoney said Zone 7 owns 25 feet around each lake except for Cope Lake. The <br />property line stops at elevation 350, or right against the bank. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky asked if Cope Lake was the only lake with a gradual incline, while the <br />others have very steep slopes, so cannot be used for recreation? <br /> <br />Ms. Mahoney said some future lakes, such as Lake A, may have a greater potential for <br />recreation because the slopes are not quite as steep. <br /> <br />Joint Workshop <br />City CounciVPlanning Commission <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />01/24/06 <br />