My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN010306
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN010306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:43 AM
Creation date
12/27/2005 9:12:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/3/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN010306
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />rights as homeowners and do what they believed was right with their property. She also <br />encouraged him to keep and maintain the character of life in the Rosepark neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mr. Sullivan did not want the HOA Board of Directors to use this rule as a barrier. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was taken as follows: <br />AYES: Council members - Brozosky, McGovern, Sullivan, and Mayor Hosterman <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmember Thorne <br />ABSTAINED: None <br /> <br />There was a break at 9:25 p.m. <br /> <br />The meeting reconvened at 9:34 p.m. <br /> <br />6d <br />UDdate reGardinG City Council Work Plan for 2005-2006. (SR 06:022) <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman asked if the Expedited Plan Check and Permitting project was a <br />program that took a great deal of time and energy to implement? When Council completed the <br />General Plan phase process, she wanted Council to discuss a number of items one of which <br />was the idea of form base codes which is in line with this project but simpler and more <br />straightforward. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho pointed out that Council had an interest in improving City services. His goal <br />was to create an environment that allowed for expedited plan check and permitting within <br />reason and staff needed to brainstorm what these ideas might be. Ultimately, what staff could <br />do administratively would be presented to Council for review and discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky suggested mailing the community newsletter to all Pleasanton residents in <br />combination with the Quarterly Recreation Program to save money. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho said staff was considering this. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman invited public comments. <br /> <br />Kevin Close, a Happy Valley resident, expressed concern related to the Happy Valley <br />Bypass Road Development goal as it related to the project description shown on page 3 of <br />Attachment A. The project description lead him to believe that the Happy Valley Specific Plan <br />had been eliminated and the goal would be to work towards what Greenbriar brings forward. He <br />referenced Council Resolution 03-008, which Council at that time said the only study would be <br />the bypass road as outlined in the Happy Valley Specific Plan. The project description did not <br />include nor did it mention the bypass road as outlined in the Happy Valley Specific Plan, which <br />was approved in 1998. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern asked staff if it believed it looked like there would ever by any building on <br />the hills on the Spotorno property where the bypass road was originally supposed to be <br />located? <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />01/03/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.