Laserfiche WebLink
<br />was not costing the City any money. He asked if Pleasanton's commitment of $1 million dollars <br />would go towards the reserve? <br /> <br />Mr. Reynolds said yes. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky said it would be hard for him to judge how much is being spent and what <br />the income and expenses would be as there was no pro-forma available. He asked what was <br />the likelihood of the reserve funds being used and at what point would they be used? <br /> <br />Mr. Reynolds said the intent is to not use these funds and to return them to the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky asked if this was based on certain utilization? <br /> <br />Mr. Reynolds said it was more complicated than that given the fact that BART was <br />working towards securing a guaranteed maximum price for the public improvements, which <br />would be all of the facets of the Station and the dynamics of interest rates that continue to <br />increase. Until BART received a guaranteed maximum price and is able to lock in an interest <br />rate, it would be hard to state a specific. Until several months ago, the long-term interest rates <br />had been stable; however, they are starting to increase significantly and in order to enable this <br />project to come together in this window of opportunity, BART must secure as expeditiously as <br />possible a guaranteed maximum price and interest rate. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky said the $1 million dollars could be used for the debt service reserve and <br />operations reserve and he would be more concerned about the requirements for using these <br />funds for operations and maintenance expenses. As the City is contributing towards the reserve <br />for these expenses the actual number of passengers would make a significant difference <br />because it costs a certain amount to operate the second BART Station and if the ridership was <br />not significant, BART would have to use funds from the operation reserve which is different than <br />the capital reserve for the debt service. <br /> <br />Mr. Reynolds said the significant point is that Pleasanton is in for a significant period of <br />time, which is five years from commencement of revenue operation and BART is responsible for <br />30 years to make the principle and interest payments. BART was hopeful that all parties would <br />ride the system as well as customers of the Mall, particularly with the expansion of the Mall, <br />which would provide a strong synergy between the transit and various employment and retail <br />elements. BART's goal is to return the reserves to the Cities of Dublin and Pleasanton and the <br />County of Alameda without any use. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky asked if staff had reviewed the pro-forma and what would be the likelihood <br />that Pleasanton's contribution of $1 million dollars would be a gift as opposed to the money it <br />received back? <br /> <br />Mr. Roush did not believe staff had seen a pro-forma. Staff had some concerns about <br />the way in which the language in the draft agreement was written concerning too much <br />discretion by BART to utilize the funds. Staff has asked BART to more adequately define what <br />would be included under the umbrella of operating and maintenance expenses because staff's <br />concern was that it would not want to wait until that fourth or fifth year and have this account <br />cleaned out so that there was nothing to return to the City. Staff is looking and continuing to <br />work with BART regarding standards that could be articulated and measured such that the City <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />11/1 5/05 <br />