Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4. CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br />Mr. Thorne requested a correction to page seven, paragraph one, of the November 15 <br />minutes to state, ''the intent of this process was to benchmark with not similar industries." Mr. <br />Brozosky requested a correction be made to page two, paragraph two, to reflect Mr. Sullivan <br />requested agenda item 4k, be removed from the Consent Calendar to Public Hearings and <br />Other Matters, agenda item 6g. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky referred to agenda item 4f and asked if the lease agreement with Ether <br />Web Network LLC precluded others from using this site? <br /> <br />Nelson Fialho, City Manager, said the lease agreement established the construction of a <br />lattice structure that would occupy not only the City's infrastructure and telecommunications <br />equipment but also the providers. If a second provider wanted to utilize this facility, it would <br />enter into negotiations on the terms and conditions with the City. <br /> <br />Michael Roush, City Attorney, said the lease agreement was written in a way to allow <br />others to use the site so long as it does not interfere with this particular use. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky asked if the City would be allowed precedent if it chose to install its own <br />communication facility in the future? <br /> <br />Mr. Roush said the lease agreement allowed the City to terminate the agreement if it <br />could show that it had some public necessity to use the site that would preclude the lessee from <br />using it. He believed the City could install its own communication system at 9000 Santos Ranch <br />Road as long it did not interfere with this particular lessees use of the site and if it was <br />demonstrated that the City's proposed use interfered with the lessee's, then the City would not <br />be allowed to install its own communication facility unless there was an overriding public <br />necessity of the need to use this site for this purpose. Staff did not anticipate this would occur. <br />He noted that every three years, the City has the option of not renewing the lease agreement. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky referred to agenda item 4e and said he was disappointed with the cost to <br />remove the roundabouts. <br /> <br />Mr. Thorne referred to agenda item 4b, PDR-496, City of Pleasanton, and asked if the <br />Delucchi Park Public Restroom project was within budget as upgrade modifications were added <br />to the project. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho said staff would present to Council a project that attempts to stay within the <br />budget of $290,000. The items that were added to this project by the Planning Commission <br />would be reflected as "add alternates" for Council to consider prior to placing this project out for <br />bid. If Council chooses to agree to any of the modifications as recommended by the Planning <br />Commission, it would have an opportunity to include them prior to going out to bid. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern commented on several items on the Consent Calendar that she believed <br />the public ought to be aware of: (1) agenda item 4b, PDR-489/PV-138, Nordstrom's and The <br />Mills Corporation - application for design review approval of a phased development plan for the <br />expansion and remodeling of Stoneridge Mall. Phase I will relocate the existing Nordstrom's <br />store by constructing 144,000 square feet of new retail area and add two restaurants (The <br />Cheese Cake Factory and PF Changs) totaling 15,600 square feet; (2) agenda item 4g, contract <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />12/06/05 <br />