My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN110105
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN110105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2008 11:23:43 AM
Creation date
11/23/2005 12:53:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/1/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN110105
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />As an example, Mr. Fialho said the Sub-Area Map could be the guiding document for <br />how the uses are allocated throughout the property and the Illustrative Map would be for the <br />voters as an example of how the Park would look at build out. <br />Mr. Thorne mentioned there was a significant amount of discussion by Council at its last <br />meeting regarding the relationship between the Master Plan, Phase II Specific Plan and what <br />was covered by the initiative. He asked staff to shed some light on this discussion. <br />Mr. Rasmussen said the Phase II Specific Plan is a land use, infrastructure and open <br />space preservation plan for the 318-acres and within that there is 30 to 50-acres that staff and <br />the Bernal Community Park Task Force had been planning for since the year 2000 as the <br />Community Park. The Task Force was created in the year 2000 to prepare a plan so that the <br />sports fields could be built and the lights installed prior to the development of the homes in that <br />area. The planning intent remains, which is a coordinated Master Plan so that as futures phases <br />come up, it could be tied in. The Master Plan would have the same planning standing as the <br />Specific Plan as a specific plan is considered a more refined extension of the General Plan and <br />nothing could be approved that was inconsistent with General Plan. The Master Plan must be <br />consistent with the Specific Plan and it would be more detailed than the Specific Plan. As far as <br />level of detail was concerned, a master plan is some where in between a specific plan and a <br />PUD development plan. The purpose of the Master Plan is to put down on paper what is <br />believed to be the ultimate build out of that 50-acres. The Master Plan should also be flexible. <br />Mr. Thorne asked how the Preferred Community Park Plan related to the Master Plan. <br />Mr. Rasmussen said staff and consultants took the Preferred Plan along with guidance <br />received from Council, Commissions, the community and town meetings and folded it into the <br />preliminary draft Bernal Property Phase II Specific Plan. Staff and the consultant's intention <br />was to do the same thing with the Master Plan: take the Preferred Plan that Council came up <br />with in June 2005 and integrate into the Master Plan all the sports fields and public facilities that <br />were shown in the Preferred Plan for the Community Park. The sports fields covered <br />approximately 42-acres in the Preferred Plan. In addition, to the south of the Community Park <br />was the area where the ACE Train Station had been previously shown and since this was not <br />included in the Specific Plan, there was an opportunity to expand the Community Park into that <br />area with perhaps a dog park, park maintenance area or some type of athletic fields or facilities <br />if desired. <br />Mr. Thorne asked if the athletic fields could be moved to make room for tennis courts? <br />Mr. Rasmussen said yes, and the draft Bernal Property Phase II Specific Plan allowed <br />for this type of use as well as open space and other uses. <br />Mr. Thorne noted there was a significant amount of confusion and when the public is <br />watching the process they become nervous that all of the work that has been completed over <br />the past five or six years is being thrown away. He believed Council needed to make sure the <br />public understood that is not what is being done and that the work that has been completed <br />would remain and be a part of the Plan. <br />Mr. Rasmussen said the only new outcome is what to do with the former ACE Train <br />Station area. <br />Pleasanton City Council 14 11/01/05 <br />Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.