My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN091905
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN091905
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:42 AM
Creation date
11/17/2005 11:57:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/19/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN091905
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Mr. Sullivan believed the urgency and/or time line was being determined by the <br />land sale and bond issues. <br /> Mr. Russell said the time line is being driven by the issuance of the bonds. <br /> It was moved by Mr. Zika, seconded by Ms. Hildenbrand, to support <br />Scheme B of the BART station and the proposed design of the parking structure. <br />The roll call vote was taken as follows: <br />AYES: Council members - Hildenbrand, McCormick, Oravetz, Zika, and <br /> Mayor Lockhart <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> It was moved by Mayor Hosterman, seconded by Mr. Thorne, to support <br />Scheme B of the BART station and the proposed design of the parking structure. <br />The roll call vote was taken as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Brozosky, McGovern, Sullivan, Thorne, and <br /> Mayor Hosterman <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> Mr. Ambrose clarified the motion, which was to allow both Councils the <br />opportunity to provide comments with respect to the design of the station and the <br />parking structures. He noted that both communities would have an opportunity to <br />further review and comment on the actual private improvements that are going to be <br />constructed on BART property which is the office building on the Pleasanton side and a <br />hotel and residential complex on the Dublin side. <br /> Mr. Sullivan asked what further discretionary review would the Pleasanton <br />Council have with respect to the office building and parking structure. <br /> Mr. Iserson said the office building or whatever it may turn into would come back <br />to Council for its review, as this is a private development piece. What is before Council <br />this evening is the BART structure itself, the station and the two parking structures. He <br />noted this would not come back to Pleasanton Council by way of a design review <br />because it is a BART project. <br /> Mr. Sullivan believed Council was approving the entire project based upon this <br />evening's presentation. <br /> Mr. Iserson said the office building on Pleasanton's side is not a part of tonight's <br />approval. <br />Joint PleasantonlDublin City Council 9 09/19/05 <br />Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.