My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN102505
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN102505
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:42 AM
Creation date
10/20/2005 3:09:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/25/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN102505
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Lee said the MTC survey was done about every ten years and asks about all <br />trips from about 10,000 households. A new study is due to be out next month of all <br />transit-oriented developments. The study Mr. Brozosky referred to dealt with apartment <br />complexes and all apartments were within one-third mile of the station. It demonstrates <br />in a suburban environment, one can see lower driving rates. <br />Mr. Brozosky asked if studies had been done to show whether it was better to <br />have high density residential development near a BART station or was it better to have <br />more businesses, so people could commute in and go to jobs? <br />Mr. Lee said his firm has done many of those studies for BART and other clients <br />in Sacramento. Generally speaking, residential is better in suburban areas. It is <br />different in downtown areas like San Francisco or Oakland. Walnut Creek and Pleasant <br />Hill are more transitional. Pleasant Hill has about 20% less drive alone traffic. By and <br />large residential development is better near transit in suburban areas. Employment <br />uses will occur with time as the area becomes more mixed. <br />Mr. Brozosky believed the major difference between Pleasant Hill and <br />Pleasanton is that in Pleasant Hill people can go in more directions. Most people would <br />go to jobs in San Francisco, while in Pleasanton the next big job center away from the <br />Tri-Valley is in Silicon Valley. It seemed better to him to put high-density residential <br />development by an ACE train station than by BART. He felt most transit-oriented <br />development was not at the end of a line. <br />Mr. Lee agreed this is a different situation, but it does present an opportunity to <br />enhance transit connections to the east. <br />Mr. Brozosky asked how much control Pleasanton had over development of the <br />BART parcel? <br />Mr. Iserson said the city had discretionary approval over a housing development <br />on that site. If it is a BART facility such as a station, parking structure, etc. then the city <br />has no control. For the Stoneridge BART station, the city would have approval of any <br />office or residential component. <br />Mr. Brozosky believed it would be necessary to build a multi-level parking <br />structure in order to get more density near the station. <br />Mr. Iserson agreed. <br />Mr. Brozosky asked if there were demographic studies available of the population <br />of those currently living in the residential areas of the business park, how many children, <br />ages, commute destinations, etc.? <br />Joint Workshop <br />City Council/Planning Commission 9 1 0/25/05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.