Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mayor Hosterman was concerned about detracting from the signs if temporary lighting <br /> was installed. She asked if there was Council support to move forward with installing the initial <br /> four signs as soon as possible and direct staff to return to Council with realistic costs to <br /> illuminate the signs. <br /> Council concurred with Mayor Hosterman's direction. <br /> Mr. Brozosky asked when the signs would be installed. <br /> Ms. Ott said the PDA's goal is to install the signs during the holiday season or by the <br /> beginning of next year. <br /> 6d <br /> ADDroval of a contract with M.D. Fotherinaham. LandscaDe Architects lMDFl to DreDare <br /> the Bernal Community Park Master Plan. (SR 05:274) <br /> Mr. Brozosky recalled Council's first direction regarding the community park began with <br /> Phase I of the Bernal Community Park, which is the lighted sports fields and part of the initiative <br /> To Save Our Community Park that placed the development of the first phase of the Community <br /> Park as the highest reasonable priority in the development of the Bernal site. He noted that <br /> Council has not decided in which direction it wished to proceed with the goal of ultimately <br /> bringing the matter to the voters. <br /> Mr. Fialho said Council approved a PUD for Phase I that authorized staff to initiate the <br /> design and construction of this project. Council also authorized staff to proceed with a specific <br /> plan process that captured the entire 318-acres of the Bernal property which plans the property <br /> from not only a community park perspective but also from the perspective of what all the various <br /> elements are within the site that would eventually be built out. The Community Park Master <br /> Plan compliments the Specific Plan and it is part of the initiative To Save Our Community Park <br /> adopted by the previous Council which included an element that said the City would initiate a <br /> master plan of the community park to compliment the development in the future. Staff has <br /> taken this mandate and the specific plan process, which is two separate processes, and is <br /> intending to blend them together into one document. The Specific Plan will specifically address <br /> the potential uses for the site and the Master Plan will focus specifically on the 50-acre park and <br /> various architectural features on the site. He has instructed staff to keep this as flexible as <br /> possible in order to avoid Council buying into a PUD. This is basically a master plan subject to <br /> modification at some point in the future depending on how Council wished to phase the project <br /> over time. Again, he noted that the Specific Plan and the Master Plan would be compiled <br /> together into one document which satisfied the initiative that Council previously adopted as well <br /> allowing Council to move forward with the Specific Plan process with the hope that this process, <br /> including the EIR, would be completed by May 17, 2006 with the ability to put the matter on the <br /> November 2006 ballot in the form of a measure. <br /> Mr. Brozosky recalled the previous Council discussed the initiative and wanted to ensure <br /> that the wording did not tie the Council's hands for the remainder of the project. He noted that <br /> the initiative To Save Our Community Park specifically slated that the development of the first <br /> phase of the Community Park shall be given the highest priority. He saw no reason to prepare <br /> a Master Plan for the 50-acre park until Council knows what is being done for the property and <br /> how everything interacts. <br /> Pleasanton City Council 29 10/18/05 <br /> Minutes <br />