My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN101805
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN101805
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:42 AM
Creation date
10/13/2005 11:47:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/18/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN101805
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Jeff Knowles, Deputy Director of Transportation, believed it would be 25 feet per car and <br /> approximately 100 vehicles. <br /> Mr. Brozosky wondered if there would be sufficient room for the traffic to back up to the <br /> side of the school if the roundabouts remained as opposed to Vineyard Avenue. <br /> Ms. McGovern was trying to decide how Vineyard Avenue was designed based on how <br /> the General Plan defined different types of roadways. <br /> Mr. Wilson said the Specific Plan called for Vineyard Avenue to be designed as a rural <br /> street. <br /> Ms. McGovern referred to the staff report for item 6b(2), which stated that although <br /> Vineyard Avenue from Bernal Avenue to Isabel is designated as a thoroughfare in the General <br /> Plan. She asked staff for the definition of a thoroughfare. <br /> Mr. Knowles said there was no definition for a thoroughfare and it was a problem during <br /> staff's presentation of the Vineyard Avenue Traffic Calming Plan. <br /> Ms. McGovern pointed out that the word "thoroughfare" was used throughout the staff <br /> report. To move Vineyard Avenue to the designation of a rural street, she asked what type of <br /> traffic is expected per hour on a rural street. <br /> Mr. Wilson noted the designation of Vineyard Avenue was a rural street in the Specific <br /> Plan, which was conducted after the General Plan was adopted. The Specific Plan stated that <br /> Vineyard Avenue should be designed to be a rural type street and it went further with the terms <br /> of the definition, which is related to the width and how many lanes it consisted of and the <br /> general nature of the street. <br /> Ms. McGovern asked what type of traffic is expected per hour because when she <br /> reviews the General Plan it measures it by what the traffic is predicted per hour. <br /> Mr. Wilson said the rural street designation has more to do with how it fits the <br /> environment and the number of lanes controls the traffic. In this case, Vineyard Avenue is two- <br /> lanes which controls the amount of traffic that would be on the street. <br /> Ms. McGovern said she could not envision the City building Vineyard Avenue to be a <br /> rural street knowing that it connects Livermore and Pleasanton. <br /> Mr. Brozosky believed staff was describing Vineyard Avenue as an arterial road with a <br /> rural feel. <br /> Mr. Wilson said a two-lane arterial street could carry 850 cars per hour. Staff has placed <br /> limitations on the number of traffic volume by the traffic signal placed at Ruby Hill. <br /> Ms. McGovern believed Council could actually predict that 850 vehicles per hour could <br /> travel on Vineyard Avenue during non-peak traffic time. <br /> Mr. Knowles noted 850 vehicles per hour is out of the General Plan and it does not <br /> mean that the roadway could not physically carry more traffic, but for a two-lane arterial, staff <br /> Pleasanton City Council 13 10/18/05 <br /> Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.