CCMIN100405 - Laserfiche WebLink

Martha Strain, a Pleasanton resident, supported the approval of the use permit for the large family daycare center. Aimee LaCivita, a Pleasanton resident and client, supported the approval of the use permit for the large family daycare center. She chose Patricia's Daycare because of the level of care and the positive manner in which the daycare center was operated. She noted that Ms. Sutton kept her clients apprised of any neighborhood complaints, particularly related to traffic and parking on the wrong side of the street. Rod Kerr, a Paseo Navarro resident, spoke in favor of the appeal and in opposition to the approval of the use permit for the large family daycare center. He wondered why Council and the State would permit a daycare where there is an in ground pool, which is a natural attraction for children. It was his understanding that the majority Mrs. Sutton's clients were nonresidents. Fernando Gutierrez, a Pleasanton resident, opposed the appeal and supported the application to expand the small family daycare into a large family daycare. Mr. Sutton, applicant, provided closing comments in response to several comments made in reference to his misleading letter. He read the letter to Council, which not only disclosed the impetus for the expansion which was to accommodate two of Ms. Sutton's existing clients that are pregnant but also disclosed that she had a license for a small daycare (maximum of eight children) and in order to accommodate this request, it would require a license for a large daycare (maximum 14 children). In consideration of his application, the letter mentioned that the Planning Department would conduct a study to determine if there would be any negative impacts in the neighborhood with respect to parking and traffic and solicit the neighborhoods opinions as to whether it considered the Suttons' Daycare to have any negative impacts on the neighborhood. The letter further mentioned that the neighborhood would see no significant changes from this action, and invited the neighborhoods questions, comments and concerns. In today's economy, he noted that it is not unusual to see both parents working to make ends meet. Daycare is a part of the fundamental fabric that makes the socioeconomic system work and Pleasanton's daycare demand is substantially exceeded by its supply. Licensed childcare is only available for 34 percent of children with parents in the labor force. Adequate daycare is needed and should be supported by all. The California Legislature clearly states that daycare is not fundamentally all for the neighborhood and further directs that a city shall not prohibit large family daycare homes but shall do one of the following and from option A, Band C, the City has chosen Option C. Option C states, "a use permit shall be granted if the large family daycare complies with local ordinances." To date, there have been two significant and substantial investigations to ascertain whether this daycare complies with the set ordinances. The results of these investigations are unanimous in their unequivocal approval. Patricia Sutton, applicant, submitted pictures to Council, which depicted various Paseo Navarro neighbors parking or driving their vehicles. Beverly McWilliams, appellant, said this issue has been difficult. She questioned the rights the neighborhood had in this situation, as this is a business that is being established in her neighborhood. She asked Council to keep the Paseo Navarro neighborhood as safe as possible. She noted a neighbor's vehicle had been hit twice by clients from the other daycare as well as a major accident in that area of the streel. The traffic is entering on one side and exiting on the other side and it is the exit to Paseo Navarro that has had these three accidents. Pleasanton City Council 9 10/04/05 Minutes