Laserfiche WebLink
<br />to a section of Vineyard Avenue, which has created a narrow driving lane and vehicles are <br />crowding the bicycle lane in order to eliminate a curve near the left hand side of the roadway. <br />She was neither opposed to two-lanes or four-lanes of traffic; however, if wider medians were <br />installed, it would put bicyclists at jeopardy. She believed the removal of the roundabouts and <br />installation of a traffic signal at the easternmost location seemed to be a better solution. <br />James Durkee, a Pleasanton resident, spoke in favor of maintaining Vineyard Avenue at <br />two-lanes between Bernal Avenue and Montevino Drive with a landscaped median. <br />Ira Madnick, a Pleasanton resident, supported maintaining Vineyard Avenue at two- <br />lanes between Bernal Avenue and Montevino Drive with a landscaped median, which he <br />believed should be a permanent solution. He believed Vineyard Avenue should not be the <br />alternative for traffic to get through to Livermore as there are other roadways in Pleasanton that <br />are four-lanes that do have sound walls. <br />Mayor Hosterman resumed her seat at the dais. <br />Mayor Hosterman invited publiC comments relating to the issues of the traffic signal <br />controlled crossing at Petronave Lane and the roundabouts on Vineyard Avenue. <br />Greg Resnik, a Vineyard Avenue resident, said he preferred a stop sign and some gaps <br />as opposed to the roundabouts given the current situation. <br />Colin Proudfoot, a Petronave Lane resident, urged Council to support the staff <br />recommendation of installing a traffic signal at the junction of Petronave Lane. The new <br />Vineyard alignment has in some effect created a dangerous line of sight issue for traffic <br />eastbound down the hill on Petronave Lane. He indicated he has to wait to hear if vehicles are <br />coming over the hill before crossing the road. He believed the Vineyard Avenue Corridor <br />Specific Plan was an adequate plan and would bring controlled growth to the eastern <br />approaches to Pleasanton. He looked forward to the implementation of the trail. <br />Written communication was received by the following residents who were in opposition <br />to making Vineyard Avenue four-lanes between Bernal Avenue and Montevino Drive: Moses <br />Peram; Pete and Cynthia Johnson; Eric Overland; Lisa Hardwood; Mark Posson; Joshua Brysk; <br />Caroline Wolford; Reid Ito; Heidi Werner; Patricia Maruko; Tom and Mary Serrano; Phil <br />Johnson; Pam Parducci; Manzar and Denise Munir; Sonja Cehic; Steve Blaney; and Lisa <br />Lorentz. <br />Written communication was received by Mayra Stapleton, a Pleasanton resident, who <br />was opposed to increasing traffic on Vineyard Avenue. She believed increasing traffic on <br />Vineyard Avenue would encourage drivers to use this road instead of Stanley Boulevard and <br />create more of congestion to the neighborhood, as people would use this as a shortcut. She <br />also believed Stanley Boulevard should continue to be the main route used to travel to <br />Livermore. <br />Written communication was received by Lisa Young-Shigemoto, a Shadow Cliffs <br />resident, who expressed her concerns regarding pedestrian traffic walking across Vineyard <br />Avenue which has become dangerous over the last few years due to increased traffic and driver <br />disregard for neighborhood pedestrians. Exiting the neighborhood from Grapevine Drive has <br />proved to be troublesome, particularly in the morning hours. Vehicles speed down Vineyard <br />Avenue in a hurry to get their children to school or get to work and vehicles back up on <br />Pleasanton City Council 22 1 0/04/05 <br />Minutes <br />