My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN092005
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN092005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:42 AM
Creation date
9/15/2005 11:52:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN092005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />concurrent test case as staff works through these revisions. He looked forward to working with <br />the City during this project. <br /> <br />Patricia Belding. a Pleasanton resident and representing Citizens For A Caring <br />Community addressed Council regarding a letter that was submitted to the City Clerk's office <br />which outlined the issues of owners requesting to convert rental property into condominiums. <br />Citizens For A Caring Community believed such conversions would seriously undermine <br />Pleasanton's ability to meet its General Plan and regional fair share housing goals. As the staff <br />report indicates that the most recent request would result in the loss of rental units for which are <br />currently affordable to low-income households. She asked staff to note that these lower rents <br />do not result from government subsidies or rent control but rather they are produced by market <br />conditions, which Pleasanton has worked diligently to create since the early 1980's. In the last <br />few years, market prices have provided affordable rental units to moderate-income families at <br />lower costs then City restricted units reserved for such households and it appears that this turn <br />has continued to the point that today the market place is now producing rental opportunities for <br />low-income households. For this reason just as the City requires certain rental units with the <br />market rate of apartment complexes to remain affordable and in perpetuity, the City should <br />vigorously protect Pleasanton's existing inventory of rental housing as this would allow <br />Pleasanton to gain the maximum benefit of market place dynamics created as it fulfills its <br />obligation to facilitate development of very low-income rental units within limited numbers while <br />remaining under Pleasanton's housing cap. She believed preserving and increasing the total <br />number of rental units ensured the market place to provide the maximum number of lower <br />income workforce housing at no cost to the City. She believed the City should also conserve at <br />the Proposition 13 lower property tax cost for older apartment complexes, which allows for lower <br />rents. These rents cannot be duplicated in newer apartment complexes without government <br />regulation and costly subsidies. Because Pleasanton has adopted a housing cap it is likely that <br />any rental unit converted to privately owned condominiums could never be replaced and for this <br />reason, conversions of rental housing to condominiums should be banned outright in <br />Pleasanton. She further stated that condominium conversions of commercial property would be <br />more beneficial in that it would address both the need to increase the City's inventory of entry <br />level ownership housing as well as Pleasanton's lopsided jobs and housing balance. She <br />hoped that Council would preserve the emerging beneficial dynamics of Pleasanton's rental <br />market place, which supports the City's General Plan goals and contributes to the fulfillment of <br />regional and state housing obligations at no cost to the City. She further requested Council to <br />prohibit condominium conversions of rental housing. <br /> <br />Becky Dennis. a Pleasanton resident, addressed Council in support of the previous <br />speaker and banning the condominium conversions. She believes other cities have ordinances <br />that are adequate in protecting tenants rights and ensuring affordable housing is included in the <br />conversions. Pleasanton is unusual in California as it is a City with a number of housing units in <br />its future. If the City bans condominium conversions and finds other ways, perhaps through the <br />Affordable Housing Fund or partnering with the business community to assist apartment owners <br />who are renting to lower income people to ensure that they could apply through a granting <br />process to assist in maintaining those units, she believed this would be a better approach. <br />Other cities have open-ended housing and there are no limits on the amounts of housing they <br />could build. If the City intends to keep its housing cap and stay in compliance with state law <br />she believed the City's has every reason to make a ban on condominium conversion as part of <br />its housing element so that it is not constantly dealing with the instability of trying to replace <br />something at a much higher cost than what was politically fought as a community over multi- <br />family housing. She believed it inappropriate to direct the Housing Commission and the <br />Planning Commission to decide what kind of a condominium conversion ordinance the City of <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />09/20/05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.