CCMIN092005 - Laserfiche WebLink

her a year ago that she would have an option to purchase her apartment when he decided to convert these units into condominiums, she may have had an opportunity to make other financial decisions. She reviewed the Pleasanton Municipal Code and found that she should have received a 60-day written notice of intent to convert prior to a public hearing before City Council, the Planning Commission or a staff review board and she never received such a notice. She expressed her concerns for the elderly and handicapped and how they have not received any options and that they have nowhere else to go. She further reviewed the State Tenant Laws that were provided to her by Ecco Housing which indicate the owner must provide a notice of intent to convert rental apartments into condominiums 180 days before the eviction. She never received this notice as indicated in Government Code Section 66427.1. Se informed Council that she has been unable to find anyone to enforce this ordinance. Mayor Hosterman indicated the City of Pleasanton was sad to lose her as a resident. She believed it is difficult to balance unconstitutional restraints on alienation of real property with trying to keep people living and working in the same community. Mr. Brozosky asked staff when this project was approved on Division Street? Mr. Bocian said the City was recently informed of this situation and staff has met and is trying to deal with the issue. This matter is unique because the condominium conversion was approved in 1981 but the owner elected to keep the development as a rental unit, and as staff interprets it, the owner has the right to convert. Unfortunately, the language that is currently in the Pleasanton Municipal Code as it pertains to tenants rights relates to those residents living at the development at the time the conversion is approved. Staff is not aware of how many residents were living there in 1981. The City's goal is to meet with the owner and certainly talk to them and determine its interest in abiding by the ordinance specifically as it relates to tenants rights. There is a question whether the owner is bound to that legally but staff believes it is the appropriate thing to do. Mayor Hosterman asked legal counsel if the language could be changed to hold property owners liable for ensuring tenants have ample notice in order for the tenants to review options to make a purchase? Michael Roush, City Attorney said one of the issues is that staff would like to talk to the property owners about taking a look at the notice that is provided to the tenants to make sure it complies with local ordinances as well as with existing state law. There have been issues raised in this community as well as other communities around the state as different units have been held onto for the past twenty to twenty-five years and now the owners are proceeding to sale them, which has a significant impact on tenants in which they otherwise would be paying a smaller amount for rent then they would be paying for a mortgage or down payment. He recommended that staff review the City's local ordinance to see if it needs to be amended. Ms. McGovern asked legal counsel if the City planned to approve conversions from apartments to condominiums such as what was done in 1981, and can the City set a limit on the years in order to avoid a significant length in time before the conversion is completed? Mr. Roush said the difficulty is that once an apartment converts to a condominium and the owner proceeds to file all the appropriate paper work, files the parcel map and the condominium plan there may be reasons economically as to why it may be difficult for the property owner to sell the units within a certain period of time for reasons such as interest rates increasing or the market may not be appropriate. There might be some things the City may be Pleasanton City Council Minutes 10 09/20/05