CCMIN083005 - Laserfiche WebLink

described cut-through traffic as traffic which should be on some other street. The golf course and future Spotorno development traffic should be on some other street, like Sycamore Creek. She asked Council to move forward with the bypass road. She noted when Council experimented with the constrained gateway at Sunol, a lot of traffic of North Sycamore and Happy Valley Specific Plan residents used Happy Valley Road and Castlewood Heights. That option may not be available in the future. If there is a constrained gateway at Sunol, it will only increase traffic delays. Option 2 referred to a turn only lane and many people turned onto Sycamore going to the business at the corner, turning around and getting back on Sycamore so they did not have to wait at the light. She suggested doing a special lane only if Happy Valley Road is gated, otherwise it serves no purpose. She asked if staff considered pedestrian safety when proposing road widenings? It seems the emphasis is only on moving cars. Michael Kliment, 5142 Foothill Road, referred to the widening of Stoneridge Drive south to Muirwood South. It has been in the General Plan for at least sixteen years. Originally there was a plan to widen Foothill Road due to a dangerous curve that had eight driveways on it. Four lanes was planned to allow deceleration and entrance and exit from the road. Those driveways have now been consolidated to two which enter the straight section of Foothill. The two-lane Foothill Road has plenty of capacity to handle existing traffic. The area is built out so there will be no more homes. He questioned why it was necessary to widen it to four lanes in that section. He would like it to be removed from the General Plan. His property is on the curve and he said his property would be cut in half if it was straightened and the other two property owners on the curve would also be affected. Tom Pico, 795 Neal Place, referred to comments that in 1996 the City Council and staff did not know traffic would be as bad as it is today. He said that was not true, but they did not have the tools to measure it back then. The current traffic model is the finest anywhere and provides excellent information. He acknowledged that Rose Avenue would never be extended due to the opposition of the Fair Board and property owners in the area. Mr. Sullivan asked what other options are being discussed and Mr. Pico said he worked for twelve years as Councilmember, Mayor, Chair of the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency and other transportation committees to try to get improvements for the 1-580/680 interchange including the f1yovers necessary to make it work. That is still not on any funding plan. It took years to just get it on the list of possible improvements. He was disappointed that such a need has been ignored. This takes regional negotiation and there are also other issues like Highway 84, the airport, Staples Ranch, ACE train station, and other transportation issues. He had always felt in the negotiations that pressure should continue to be placed on the 1-580/680 improvements. He believed that last "chip" in the negotiations is Stoneridge Drive. He cautioned people not to give that away at this time. He did not advocate extension at this time. He felt there were alternatives that could still be found. He advised taking the connector bridge out of the General Plan. Without that, the road could not be extended. Someday it may be possible to determine how to build the extension without affecting the neighborhood and with regional cooperation. He stressed the importance of regional cooperation and the need to look at the big picture. He supported Alternative B, constrained gateways and limiting residual demand. Kevin Close, 871 Sycamore Road, was happy to see the bypass road moved to the priority list and included in all the alternatives. He supported Alternative B because of the EI Charro connection, but would not oppose Alternative C. He reiterated his concerns about the safety of golf course traffic on the Happy Valley area roads. Joint Workshop City CounciVPlanning Commission 10 08/30105