My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN082305
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN082305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:42 AM
Creation date
8/18/2005 11:52:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/23/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN082305
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Mr. Sullivan pointed out that public money is an investment with a return realized on its <br /> investment. <br /> Mr. Fialho pointed out that the definition of this goal is confusing because the way in <br /> which it is written. He believed the goal was to provide an opportunity for the City to showcase <br /> PV technology wherever the opportunity presents itself. If Council chose to pursue the publiC <br /> piece, it is a capital improvement project and if it were determined to be a priority, he would <br /> include this in the CIP plan for the upcoming fiscal year and incorporate it into one of the major <br /> renovation projects. <br /> In response to an inquiry by Mayor Hosterman, Mr. Fialho said $250,000 had been set <br /> aside for general energy efficiency projects, which could include PV projects. <br /> For clarification on tHe PV goal, Mr. Fialho believed the majority of Council agreed to; as <br /> the City moved forward with public projects, explore a PV project for one of these sites. <br /> Council agreed to Mr. Fialho's interpretation of this goal. <br /> There was a break at 9:10 p.m. <br /> The meeting reconvened at 9:15 p.m. <br /> Mayor Hosterman changed her ranking from not a priority to a priority to support the goal <br /> of Joint Cities for Climate Projection (CC). <br /> (15) Citv Services - there were no changes to the priorities as listed in <br /> Attachment A to the staff report. <br /> In response to an inquiry by Ms. McGovern, Mr. Fialho said staff is in the process of <br /> developing a community newsletter that would be published three times a year. <br /> (16) Public Information - there were no changes to the priorities as listed in <br /> Attachment A to the staff report. <br /> Mr. Brozosky suggested adding an additional priority entitled "Campaign Financing <br /> Reform." He expressed his concern with the escalating costs of regular and special municipal <br /> elections. <br /> Mayor Hosterman was concerned about limiting campaign contributions that any <br /> individual could make to support a candidate or measure as candidates could expend an <br /> unlimited amount of money. As soon as Council implements campaign reform, it presents an <br /> opportunity for others to mount a strong campaign against incumbents, which places <br /> incumbents in a tough position. <br /> Mr. Brozosky noted that the cost of conducting elections has increased significantly and <br /> Council has not discussed or considered any solutions. <br /> Ms. McGovern expressed her concern regarding Political Action Committees (PACs) <br /> being able to buy an election. <br /> City Council Priorities Workshop 18 08123/05 <br /> Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.