Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Brozosky asked how the density proposal would effect the land use of the General <br />Plan? <br /> Mr. Iserson said the Downtown Specific Plan could accommodate the density proposal <br />as there are fairly significant portions of the residential area in the Downtown that are already <br />zoned and general planned for high density residential. Second units are encouraged in the <br />Downtown and do not count as residential units. Furthermore, the Specific Plan encourages <br />mixed-use development. <br /> Mr. Brozosky asked what the disconnect was between what the Downtown Specific Plan <br />says to what business owners and residents are trying to do. <br /> Mr. Iserson did not believe there was a disconnect. The disconnect might be that staff <br />has not implemented some of the policies of the Specific Plan that identify some issues that <br />staff was aware of during the Specific Plan process. He noted there have been some <br />constraints for homeowners on Second Street where people wanting to move in want some type <br />of accommodation to meet their new needs. The Specific Plan encourages staff to look at these <br />standards to encourage homeowners to continue the process of moving into these homes and <br />fixing them up to continue their uses as family neighborhoods. <br /> Mr. Brozosky asked if it was an appropriate time for staff to work on the density <br />proposal, particularly with everything that is involved in the General Plan update. <br /> Mr. Fialho said the General Plan is clearly a priority and he would prefer to complete this <br />process first. At Council's recent goal setting session, it discussed some of the priority projects <br />in the Downtown but there was no mention of the Downtown Specific Plan. Unlike other <br />Specific Plans where it relies on development to facilitate what is contemplated in a specific <br />plan, the City drives some of the items that are identified in the Downtown Specific Plan, <br />whether it is restrooms or improvements to Lions Wayside Park or the Firehouse Arts Theater. <br />To get at this issue and many other issues identified in the Downtown Specific Plan, he <br />suggested Council support a general policy statement that states, "Council supports the <br />implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan in order to allow Council the opportunity to <br />endorse the plan and see it proceed forward to reality." <br /> Mayor Hosterman agreed with Mr. Fialho's suggestion with the addition of promoting the <br />idea of a new library to the community instead of a new civic center. The new library could <br />possibly be located where City offices are currently located which is in keeping with the <br />Downtown entry enhancement, which would allow the community the opportunity to have a <br />library that would not be a solo destination. It would also be an opportunity to have a beautiful <br />potential entry to the Downtown at that end of town and allow for more pedestrian use at that <br />part of the Downtown. In addition, this might connect with the new Cultural Arts facility on the <br />Bernal property and may present an opportunity to utilize the existing library site by City <br />employees. <br /> Mr. Fialho pointed out these are two separate projects. The Downtown Specific Plan <br />currently specifies for the civic center to be in its current location and not at the library site. He <br />believed the library issue would be addressed as one of Council's priorities that it currently has <br />listed. The guiding document for a comprehensive approach to the Downtown and the basis for <br />proceeding forward should be the Downtown Specific Plan as there many things contemplated <br />in this Plan that the Council, staff and the community has collectively lost site of. <br />City Council Priorities Workshop 14 08123/05 <br />Minutes <br />