Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Parsons said yes, and noted that Corrie Development has a lengthy process ahead <br />of it with an environmental document required and various public hearings. Corrie Development <br />anticipated that this would be a 12-month process and once it has secured its approvals from <br />the County and any regulatory permits, it hopes to begin construction in the spring of 2006. <br /> <br /> In response to an inquiry by Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Parsons said a very limited area would be <br />planted in lawn. The darker green areas as reflected in the Concept Plan is where the burials <br />will be located and the lighter green area will be open space and not irrigated. He noted that the <br />darker green areas are located on top of a ridge and the olive colored areas are for the <br />proposed graded areas. A road will link up to the Valley and to the ridge where an additional <br />burial site will be located. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sullivan asked if this would be an invisible area from off-site? <br /> <br /> Mr. Parsons did not believe so and noted that the mausoleums on top of the ridge are <br />approximately 14-feet in height and will be clustered in the center of the traffic circles and set <br />back from the top of the ridge by approximately 150 feet. He noted this area will be heavily <br />landscaped that will provide screening. He noted that in Corrie Development's preliminary <br />discussions with Contra Costa County, one of the concerns of staff was the visual impact, which <br />he believed would be addressed in the environmental document. <br /> <br /> In response to an inquiry by Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Parsons believed the environmental <br />document would be a Negative Declaration. Once the initial study is conducted and the impacts <br />are identified, the County will determine which environmental document would be appropriate. <br />He noted that a cemetery would be compatible with being located outside the Urban Limit Line. <br /> <br /> In response to an inquiry by Ms. McGovern, Mr. Parsons said the concept plans did not <br />include a crematorium nor was one planned. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern asked if Corrie Development would consider increasing the number of <br />burials once the 100,000 are full? <br /> <br /> Mr. Parsons did not anticipate the burial range being beyond 100,000. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern asked how Corrie Development planned to separate its property from the <br /> adjacent property owners? <br /> <br /> Mr, Parsons said fencing would be placed around the perimeter of the property. <br /> Mayor Hosterman invited public comments. <br /> <br /> Harriet Newman said she owned property at 7200 Camino Tassajare and opposed the <br /> proposed cemetery project. Her concerns related to open space, a crematorium and water <br /> needed to maintain the landscaping and for cemetery of this size, it could affect existing wells. <br /> She was also concerned about any future expansion plans, ongoing maintenance, security, <br /> traffic, and endangered species. <br /> <br /> Bill Newman said he owned property at 7200 Camino Tassajara and opposed the <br /> proposed cemetery project. He concurred with Ms. Newman's comments. If Council were to <br /> adopt a resolution, he requested that Council change the title of it to read, "a resolution <br /> supporting the concept of Creekside Memorial Park," as endorsing the concept is more <br /> reasonable given the fact that final plan is unknown at this point. He also requested that <br /> Council eliminate Section 3 of the resolution as this is a serious issue and a cemetery is <br /> <br /> Pleasanton City Council 24 07/19/05 <br /> Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />