My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060805
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN060805
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:41 AM
Creation date
6/16/2005 4:09:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/8/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN060805
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Fialho stated that the Aquatic Center expansion was not listed as a priority <br />and was not reflected on the list. During the narrative discussion, staff attempted to <br />fund Council priorities and as part of the analysis, staff reviewed improvements it felt <br />needed to be funded for long-term purposes or program expansions or maintenance <br />activities. This project has been on the books for some time and staff is recommending <br />an additional funding of $1.35 million. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern questioned whether additional funding would be needed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Bocian said that it is just a reserve at this point. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern questioned the reserve for the Bernal Property Improvements and <br />the $4.1 million for Phase I that it is not listed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Bocian pointed out that Phase I is a separate project. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern requested that all of the Bernal Property projects be combined in <br />order to see how much money is being spent. She questioned the addition of $6 million <br />dollars for Phase II, III and IV of the Bernal property. <br /> <br /> Mr. Bocian said that this is a general reserve for the Bernal property. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern questioned the estimated $10 million Bernal Property reserve and <br />the fact that staff is unable to provide an expenditure breakdown. She also questioned <br />the #3.8 million additional funds for the Civic Center and believed these funds were <br />being directed towards the expansion of the Library. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fialho said staff has been looking at the Civic Center project more <br />comprehensively. Rather than just a Civic Center improvement, staff has been <br />considering whether or not the Library expansion could be folded into the reserve, <br />assuming Council wants to do a Library expansion. Recently staff contemplated placing <br />a Youth Center somewhere on the site, although Council recently made the decision to <br />place the Youth Center on the Bernal property. He noted that over the next four years, <br />the reserve would accumulate $6.2 million, which could be used for either Civic Center <br />improvements such as a City Hall or for expansion of the Library depending on Council <br />policy direction. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern noted that the Library expansion is one of the number one goals <br />of all the Commissions. She believed this project should be separate because it will be <br />extremely costly. She acknowledged the decision had not been made as to whether the <br />current Library could be expanded. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fialho said that was correct and indicated that this fund is a placeholder to <br /> set funds aside to use for either Civic Center improvements or an expansion of the <br /> Library. Staff plans to present this matter to Council for direction on the use of the <br /> funds. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern questioned the different funding sources on the Kottinger Creek <br /> Restoration Project. <br /> <br /> City Council Workshop <br /> 16 O6/08/O5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.