My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN051205
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN051205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:41 AM
Creation date
5/12/2005 8:40:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/12/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN051205
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Fialho believed the type of fields was close in both plans and felt the real <br /> question was the number of sports fields. He believed he had heard support for seven <br /> or eight and requested direction to staff. <br /> <br /> Mayor Hosterman wanted as many fields as possible on the 45 acres. She felt it <br /> was a question of how many acres to devote to this portion of the park, not necessarily <br /> the number of fields. If staff could get a couple more fields out of this acreage, she felt <br /> the community would be thankful. She believed the original RRM Design Group plan <br /> called for ten fields. <br /> <br /> Ms. Narum indicated the original design was for ten, but in the lower corner, the <br /> two football/lacrosse fields were in the outfield of the two informal baseball fields, so you <br /> could not use the fields simultaneously. There were in essence eight fields that could <br /> be used at one time. She strongly urged eight fields at a minimum. The plan included <br /> two soccer fields, with field #2 a stadium championship field that could be used for <br /> soccer, football or lacrosse. There were three baseball fields of appropriate size, and <br /> two football/lacrosse fields. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern really liked the idea of multi-use fields. When baseball season is <br /> over, there are fields that are not used. She did not believe the four lighted softball <br /> complex fields are used as much as they could be. She hoped there could be more <br /> multi-use fields. <br /> <br />-- Ms. Narum agreed with the concept. She said the park task force has strongly <br /> urged that enough room be allowed in the soccer/football/lacrosse fields to allow more <br /> fields for a tournament. She wanted to keep in mind that these are the only other <br /> lighted fields in town and as the sports are going more year round, they are the ones <br /> that will be used when it is off-season and the groups can't get into the Sports Park. <br /> She believed the two soccer fields at the top of the proposed park would be heavily <br /> used because there are no other good soccer fields, because they are being converted <br /> to baseball fields. She believed this plan gives a good blend, because if provides <br /> lighted fields the groups can use for tournaments and off-season, when the real issues <br /> tend to arise. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sullivan referred to the third draft community park plan alternative, which has <br /> ten fields. He agreed with setting a minimum of eight fields, but felt if there is a proposal <br /> for the cultural arts center in the northeast comer with parking, it may significantly <br /> change the current plans for where the sports fields will be located. There is an 800- <br /> foot setback for lighted sports fields from the neighbors, which needs to be maintained. <br /> To put in eight to ten fields, plus an arts center, plus some kind of open feeling will push <br /> everything down on the site and he wanted to see what that would look like. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky liked the idea of multi-use fields. He did not want to see all the <br /> lighted fields used at the same time creating a huge glow. He agreed there is a need <br /> for sports fields, but also believed there was a large part of the community that did not <br /> want this to be just a sports park. If we keep adding fields, there will be no meadow. <br /> <br /> Joint Workshop <br /> City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission <br /> 16 05/12/05 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.