Laserfiche WebLink
4. Action Items Concerninq General Plan Update: Circulation Element <br />Update - "Existinq" and "Existinq Plus Approved" Development Intersection <br />Levels-of-Service <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brozosky, seconded by <br />Councilmember McGovern, to select Option B-1 for future workshops. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brozosky, McGovern, Sullivan, and Mayor <br /> Hosterman <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Mr. Sullivan felt as a baseline, consideration should be given to existing <br />plus approved in Pleasanton, but regional should be reviewed at build out. If <br />decisions are being made for build out in Pleasanton, it should be in comparison <br />to build out regionally. He felt three things needed to be looked at: Circulation <br />and mitigations, land use changes, and policy changes. These things cannot be <br />looked at independently. If Council tries to mitigate what is in the existing <br />General Plan, there may be a decision not to build what is in the existing General <br />Plan. That may create different impacts on gateways of land uses affecting <br />traffic. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovem agreed with Mr. Sullivan. She agreed to use regional build <br />out for comparison since that is a major factor for the General Plan. She agreed <br />for the need to review policy issues along with land use. There may be a <br />decision not to change the policy of levels of service. She wanted to look at <br />mitigations for the current conditions to see if she can support them. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Brozosky, seconded by Mayor Hosterman, to <br />request additional information from staff aa follows: 1) determine what are <br />the legislative constraints regarding density transfers from one location to <br />another; 2) clearly define cut through traffic; 3) determine actual number of <br />built plus approved units and the number of units left to reach the housing <br />cap; 4) for all existing plus approved future traffic models to uae the 2025 <br />numbers for regional build out and not the 2010 numbers. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sullivan asked for clarification on the first recommendation. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky explained that there is current legislation that says density <br />cannot be removed from one location unless it is transferred to another location <br />in the city. He believed that as Council reviews land use and circulation that <br />could override some of the decisions. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 2 03/22/05 <br />Special Meeting Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />