My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN030105
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN030105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:41 AM
Creation date
3/30/2005 10:56:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/1/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN030105
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
anyone from the outside. To the veterans and a majority of the citizens of this City, this <br />would be equivalent to installing a port-a-potty in the center of the Golden Gate Bridge <br />and expect the general public to find it a pleasing attraction. With 75-years of historical <br />significance, this building should be listed as a historical landmark in the City's records <br />and carefully maintained for all future generations to enjoy. His hopes remain high that <br />Council will concur with the veterans' historical perspective and that the Veterans <br />Memorial Building will remain as its predecessors had envisioned as a symbol from a <br />great City by its grateful citizens to its citizens. <br /> <br /> Michael O'Callaghan, a member of the Pleasanton Downtown Association <br />Design Review Committee, apologized for this becoming an issue of patriotism, which is <br />not how he and the Pleasanton Downtown Association feels. He noted that this is a <br />public building owned by the citizens of the City of Pleasanton. The primary use of this <br />building is for the veterans, which he supports. He attended the majority of the Specific <br />Plan meetings and the veterans agreed to disagree. He encouraged them to come back <br />with some options, as the public restrooms are needed in the downtown. The Veterans <br />Memorial Building is a viable location for a public restroom facility for temporary <br />purposes. Other possible locations for public restrooms would be the Museum, Delucchi <br />or Lions Wayside Park, and Vervais Avenue. He encouraged Council to come up with a <br />viable solution. He questioned staff's estimated cost of $50,000 to construct the public <br />restroom. He noted that this is by no means a slight on the building or the degradation <br />of the veterans' status in our country. <br /> <br /> Written correspondence was received from the following Pleasanton residents <br />who supported a public restroom in the downtown that included a diaper-changing <br />station: Karl Becker, Jeri Ann May, Kelly Contois, Carolyn Weissbeg, Meredith Embree, <br />Mr. and Mm. Purnell, Beth Mucatel, Jennifer Duckworth, Liz Ray, Robin Cruz, Elizabeth <br />Gallagher, Sarit Schube, Sam Seo, Chelise Stroud Hery, Mara Scherer, and Adrienne <br />Torre. <br /> <br /> Written correspondence was received from the following downtown business <br />owners who supported a public restroom at the exterior of the Veterans Memorial <br />Building: Randy Randhawa, Main Street Spirits & Deli; Wendy Barnes; Nancy Consos, <br />Sincerely Yours; Marleen Armstrong; Judy Wheeler Ditter, Towne Center Books; Alex <br />and Roslinda, Alexander's Main Street Gallery; Peter MacDonald; Teri Sherman and <br />Nancy Grant, Pleasanton Travel; Alexis Gass, Clover Creek; Amy Amamou, Primrose <br />Bakery; Rodger Mattern, American Harvest; and Bill Laube, Pleasanton Hotel. <br /> <br /> Written correspondence was received from the following individuals who <br /> supported a public restroom at the exterior of the Veterans Memorial Building: Jan <br /> Batcheller, Kathy Quillin, Bernie Billen, Larry Phillips, Chris Schlies, Bonnie Shamblin, <br /> and Katherine Clark Pace. <br /> <br /> Mayor Hosterman closed the public hearing. <br /> <br /> Mayor Hosterman concurred with Mr. O'Callaghan. She noted that clean public <br /> restrooms are needed in the downtown. If Council was not to go in this direction, she <br /> asked staff how expediently it could consider a similar unisex restroom facility for the <br /> public that would be large enough to accommodate a diaper-changing station at <br /> Delucchi Park or Lions Wayside Park? She noted that either of these sites would be <br /> more convenient for the Concerts in the Park and for users of the Farmers Market. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 7 03/01/05 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.