My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN030105
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN030105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:41 AM
Creation date
3/30/2005 10:56:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/1/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN030105
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
clear that what the City is doing is seeking input and not necessarily influencing any <br />particular political agenda. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern said she wants to know whether the public thinks Council is <br />headed in the right direction. She also would like the public to be given the opportunity <br />to weigh in on quality of life issues. She has discussed the General Plan with members <br />of the community and they are concerned that their quality of life will be reduced. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fialho noted that it takes time to compile a statistically valid survey, and to <br />conduct a survey within this time frame would not be realistic. It would more be more <br />appropriate to conduct a survey that would include the General Plan theme and <br />elements when the draft General Plan is available. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush pointed out that if the survey was conducted at the time when the draft <br />General Plan was available, Council might need to reissue another draft or prepare <br />another draft of the Environmental Impact Report depending upon the survey results. <br />He noted that it is not a simple process to compile a statistically valid survey, and the <br />process to compile the last Community Survey took about a year and a half to come up <br />with the questions. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern was interested in conducting a statistically valid survey. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky believed the survey needed to be conducted early on in the <br />process. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern believed it was important for Council to seek more public input <br />and not just limit the discussions to the City Commissioners and committee members. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky suggested holding public forums at the Farmers Market where <br />Council and staff could be present on certain days throughout the General Plan update <br />process. He believed this would generate a different representation of the community <br />that is not actively engaged in the General Plan meetings. <br /> <br /> Mr. lserson noted that staff is planning to hold several Town Meetings. Staff has <br />placed public input as a high priority in this process. Part of the process included <br />community meetings held in various locations in the City where the public was invited to <br />share their thoughts and concerns. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky referred to the scheduled proposed for this summer and asked how <br />realistic is it as there will be a new council member that will be starting in July. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fialho said the schedule would be adjusted to accommodate the new council <br />member. <br /> <br /> Mayor Hosterman invited public comments. <br /> <br /> Judith Geiselman, a Pleasanton resident, thanked staff for providing the report <br />and charts. She approved of the way in which staff is tracking the multiple components <br />because documents such as these help the public understand. She noted there her <br />experience in planning is only related to teaching and training of long-range planning, <br />She thanked Council for including energy and sustainability elements in the General <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council l 8 03/01/05 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.