CCMIN021505 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. McGovern asked if the parent or guardian's information is disclosed to the public. Mr. Zolfarelli said the parent or guardian information is confidential. Ms. McGovern believed it was important to note that the parent or guardian information will not be disclosed to the public and that this information is confidential. Mayor Hosterman declared the public hearing open. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Ms. McGovern, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, to adopt Resolution 05-010, a resolution establishing City of Pleasanton Fire Stations as Safe Surrender Baby sites. The roll call vote was taken as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Brozosky, McGovern, Sullivan, and Mayor Hosterman NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Item 6c Bernsl Community Park Master Plan Review Process. (SR 05:055) Jim Wolfe, Parks and Community Services Director, presented background information and provided the status of the Bernal property planning, which included the draft Bernal Property Phase II Specific Plan, the Community Park Master Plan and the Phase One Baseball Fields Plan. Wayne Rasmussen presented the review process options for the Community Park Master Plan. Mayor Hosterman asked staff to describe more fully the process of having these two long-term plans come together and dovetail for planning purposes. She noted that the draft Phase II Specific Plan and the Community Park Master Plan are separate from the Baseball Fields Plan process as the baseball fields are progressing independently, in order to allow construction to begin as soon as possible. Mr. Rasmussen noted that the process would include shared meetings with the Commissions, a Town Hall meeting, and a joint study session between the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council, and ultimately to the Council for decision. Council will then be able to provide staff direction for finalizing the Draft Phase II Specific Plan text and the draft Community Park Master Plan, and also provide direction to staff in preparing the Community Park PUD development plan application package for formal hearings. An environmental impact review would be conducted. At this point, the community park and the specific plan processes are separate. He noted that the draft specific plan does not need to include uses, it can simply show an area where the community park would be located and could provide policies that relate to the uses that could potentially be located in the community park. At the conclusion of the review process, the specific plan or the land use portion of it will be subject to a vote of the Pleasanton City Council 5 02/15/05 Minutes