Laserfiche WebLink
Item 6b <br /> PAP-72~ (PADR-414)~ James Ervin (SR 05:005) <br /> AD~eal of the PlanninD Commission's denial of an aoolication for desiRn review <br /> aooroval to construct an aD=roximatel¥ 768-square-foot addition, to be used as <br /> retail space~ in front of the existin;I sin.qle-famil¥ home located at 4473 Railroad <br /> Avenue; three pa~rking spaces would be added at the rear of the property. Zoning <br /> for the property is C-C (Central Commercial) and Downtown Revitalization District. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sullivan recused himself, as he was a member of the Planning Commission <br /> at the time this item was discussed and denied. <br /> <br /> Mr. Iserson presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Mayor Hosterman was concerned about the addition being esthetically and <br /> amhitecturally pleasing but also in keeping with the flavor of downtown. <br /> <br /> Mr. Iserson said staff feels that the proposed design would accomplish that. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky asked how much of the building has changed in the past 104 <br /> years? <br /> <br /> Mr. Iserson said it is hard for him to know how much the building has changed <br /> over the years. When the applicant purchased the home, he did renovations to the <br />· - house to upgrade the exterior and brought in some detailing that was not on the original <br /> building, which made it look more historical. He believed the applicant has done a <br /> number of positive changes to the building over the years. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky asked if some of the changes to the building have been to the <br /> exterior? <br /> <br /> Mr. Iserson said yes. <br /> <br /> Mayor Hosterman declared the public hearing open. <br /> <br /> James Ervin, applicant, mentioned that he has done cosmetic and detail work to <br /> the house when he pumhased it in 1996. He upgraded the house with air conditioning, a <br /> new heating system and recessed lighting. An addition to the home was built two years <br /> ago, which duplicated everything that was in the existing home. The new addition will <br /> use the same type of material and trim to maintain the same amhitecture. <br /> <br /> Michael O'Callaghan, representing the Pleasanton Downtown Association (PDA), <br /> said the PDA is in support of staff's recommendation and the conditions of approval. He <br /> noted that City staff has worked diligently to develop a relationship with the Association <br /> through continued ongoing negotiations to develop the downtown consistent with design <br /> guidelines. He encouraged the Planning Commission and Council to consider that there <br /> has been an ample amount of time put into these projects. <br /> <br /> Peter MacDonald, representing the Pleasanton Downtown Association, said this <br /> is the kind of investment that the PDA would like to encourage in the downtown. The <br /> proposed application is on a small scale, pedestrian oriented, retail, helps to build the <br /> <br /> Pleasanton City Council 9 01/04/05 <br /> Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />