My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN010405
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN010405
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:40 AM
Creation date
12/22/2004 11:36:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/4/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN010405
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
critical mass, and fits with the vision that the PDA has for the downtown and the Specific <br />Plan. The Pieasanton Downtown Association agrees with the Planning Commission that <br />it has to watch the historical issues, which is monitored by City staff and the PDA. He <br />noted that this building was not on the adopted list of downtown historical resources for <br />both primary and secondary units. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky was comfortable that the applicant has tried to preserve the <br />historical portion of this building. He was encouraged that there are some property <br />owners trying to work on Railroad Avenue to improve it. With the conversion of the <br />downtown Fire Station into a small theater, it opens the downtown to not only Main <br />Street but also to Railroad Avenue and all of the streets in between Railroad Avenue and <br />Main Street becomes a part of the downtown. He noted that this is one of the few <br />projects before Council that provides for parking. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Brozoaky, seconded by Ms. McGovern, to uphold the <br />appeal, thus approving the design review application by finding that the project is <br />consistent with the General Plan, the Downtown Specific Plan, and the Downtown <br />Design Guidelines, and adopting Resolution 05-001, a resolution upholding the <br />appeal of Case PAP-72, thereby approving the application of James Ervin for <br />design review approval, as filed under Case PDR-414. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovem believed this building did not make the list of historical buildings <br />because the picture looks like it could have been torn down before Mr. Ervin did the <br />renovation work. The proposed retail addition is attractive. She supported the idea and <br />noted that this building will become a vital part of the downtown as Wayside Park is built <br />larger, in addition to the black box theater. She asked staff if the City has begun to work <br />with the Pleasanton Downtown Association to identify and advance the historical <br />structures that will be subject to exact preservation as opposed to other type of uses? <br /> <br /> Mr. Fialho said that this project stopped a few years ago. He said it would be <br />appropriate for Ms. McGovern to raise this issue under Matters Initiated by Council and <br />direct staff to work on it. <br /> <br /> As part of the vitality of the downtown and General Plan, Ms. McGovern believed <br />that this is something that should be done. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Brozoaky, McGovern and Mayor Hoaterman <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />RECUSED DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Councilmember Sullivan <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 6c <br />Bernal Property Phase II Specific Plan and Phase I Sports Fields (SR 05:010) <br />(1) Planning Process Status Report <br /> (2) City Council input regarding five site plan alternatives for the "Central Area" of the <br /> 318-acre City-owned Bernal Property Phase II Specific Plan Area <br /> (3)Review and approval of Bernal Community Park Phase I Sports Fields <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 10 01/04/05 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.