Laserfiche WebLink
Peter Shutts, 4133 Mohr Avenue, architect for Mr. Pflug, briefly related the facts <br />of the application and was available to answer any questions. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked about Condition 11 and staff and Mr. Shutts agreed to delete <br />the sentence. <br /> <br />There being no further speakers, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Hosterman, seconded by Mr. Campbell, to introduce <br />Ordinance No. 1911, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, <br />approving the application of Paul Pflug for PUD Development Plan approval, as <br />filed under Case PUD-41, subject to the conditions of approval set forth in exhibit <br />B, and to remove the fourth sentence from Condition 11. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Council members - Ayala, Brozosky, Campbell, Hostermsn, and <br /> Mayor Pice <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 6b <br />PDR-289. PCUP-86~ and PUD-81-25-6M1 Fairland Investment~ Inc. <br />ADDlicetion for dseifln review approval and conditional use permit approval of a <br />self service ¢3asoline station on an approximately 1.25 acre site consistinq of el;Iht <br />fuel Dump dispensersI a drive-throuqh carwashI a 3~600 sq. ft. convenience_ <br />market, and a modification to the Stanley Business Park PUD development plan to <br />allow alcoholic bevera;le sales from the convenience market. <br />(SR 04:265) <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Mayor Pico declared the public hearing open. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky indicated he lives in that general neighborhood and has to make <br />other trips to town to get gas. He asked if the traffic model take into consideration- <br />removed trips from other parts of town by being able to go to this station rather than <br />stations in other parts of town? <br /> <br /> Mr. Iserson said it generally does, but not during peak hours. That is if a person <br />stops at the station on the way to or from work, then there was an adjustment in the <br />traffic analysis to account for that. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hosterman referred to the staff report statement that traffic was not <br />cumulatively significant in adding traffic to the intersection. She asked for a definition of <br />the word "significant". According to the traffic report there will be increased numbers of <br />car trips generated by this station. This intersection is LOS F and therefore the project <br />would not conform to the General Plan, so that concerned her. She noted there were a <br />couple more applications coming forward in that general area. She asked how this <br />application could not be taken out of the General Plan process or how some other <br />application, which may have a greater impact on the neighborhood, could be dealt with. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 5 10/19/04 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />