Laserfiche WebLink
possible. He noted that there are maintenance trails and a drainage channel that runs at <br />the base of the freeway, with deer habitation in this area, which would cause a <br />disturbance. M.D. Fotheringham would come up with another solution. <br /> <br /> Steve Pollock, Auerbach, Pollock, Friedlander, Performing Arts/Media Facilities <br />Planning and Design, mentioned that there are several things that need to be done that <br />concern the adjacent homes f~om what would be a sound wall by 1-680. There is a <br />combination of dishing the land as well as berming and creating perimeter structures so <br />that there is a hierarchy of carving out the land as well as building up structures. The <br />plans provide for an esplanade around the back of the civic arts ,complex that can be used <br />for concession and food areas. He pointed out that a sound wall along the 1-680 corridor <br />addresses sound that is immediately sheafing off, and is not as strong as the sound that <br />runs down the highway. He believed the majority of the noise would be coming from <br />down the hill more in the direction of 1-580. The design team not only created an <br />acoustical shadow to eliminate the sound from the highway but also created an acoustical <br />shadow to eliminate the sound from the civic arts complex to the neighboring residents. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala mentioned that the Jury recommended moving the civic arts complex <br />to the northeast of Valley Avenue. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fotheringham said that after the first stage of the competition, the Jury <br />recommended moving the civic arts complex southwest of Valley Avenue, which M.A. <br />Fotheringham did. After the second stage of the competition, the Jury recommended <br />moving the civic arts complex northeast of Valley Avenue. M.A. Fotheringham moved <br />the location of the civic arts complex southwest and felt better about this location than at <br />its first location. He pointed out that there is a tremendous amount of noise that is <br />generated from Bernal Avenue, which he believed would have the same impact as the <br />freeway. M.A. Fotheringham believed that the location of any of the venues were the best <br />based upon the program that it was provided. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky believed M.D. Fotheringham's approach was innovative for the <br />road that runs down the center of the commercial property. This approach removes all of <br />the traffic from the residential areas as it enters the park, and allows for shared parking <br />for multiple events. <br /> <br /> William Liskamm, Competition Coordinator, highlighted the Jury's comments, <br />concerns and questions as attached to the staff report. <br /> <br />Mayor Pico opened It~e meeting for public comments. <br /> <br /> Marilyn Kane, a Pleasanton resident, would like the design for the path to have <br />adequate room to accommodate walkers and bicyclists. She would also like for the <br />Foothill residents to be able to access the end of the park by some type of overhead <br />structure that would accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians. <br /> <br />Mayor Pico closed the public testimony. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 5 10/12104 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />