CCMIN032304 - Laserfiche WebLink

asked youth and adults for their ideas and better water slides appeared on the list. The Committee was then told that the City could not pay for these types of activities and should look to the business community to help make this happen. She pointed out that this project is exactly the type of partnership that has been encouraged. The Committee has been researching youth centers for the past year, and she has gone on field trips to see what other communities have to offer for its families. She noted that the City of Newark is building its own conununity water park next to its community center. Even though the City of Newark already owned the land, it is spending over $13 million dollars out of its General Fund to build the water park. Members of the community would like the City of Pleasanton to have enough money to improve the Bemal property, a new library, a teen center and sports fields. This is an oppommity for the City to gain an improved water park as well as a much-needed BMX Park at no burden to the taxpayers, and generate revenue for EBRPD, the City and the School District. As a taxpayer, she believed this proposal was a great opportunity, and she believed the City would be foolish to miss this opportunity. She asked Council for its leadership, and asked Council to remove the fear and emotion and to evaluate this project on its facts. She believed that supporting this project would be the right decision for Pleasanton. Doug Boedecker, 2979 Chardonnay Drive, concurred with the previous speaker's comments. The water park will not be a huge mega water park and will not attract the same type of crowds that the Concord and San Jose facilities attract. He disagreed with the statement made that the expansion of the water park is in ten plus acres of natural habitat. He believed the positives far outweigh the negatives and urged Council to approve the project. Bill Rose, 5550 San Juan Way, mentioned that he is the Director of the Ohlone Autobon Society and has to test the expansion of the park on environmental and ecological grounds. Shadows Cliffs Park has a unique riparian woodland. This woodland is unique in the Tri-Valley area in that it is home to an egret, heron and cormorant active riparian; the nearest comparable riparian is located in Hayward. Many native birds rest at Shadow Cliffs Regional Park and need peace and quiet to successfully nest and raise their young. The expansion of the water park will have a significant negative impact on these birds. If the expansion of the water park was approved, he suggested that the following provisions be included in the project: an extensive effort should be made to mitigate the negative impact that the construction and the operation of the water park will have on birds and animal life of Shadow Cliffs; construction activities be halted during the nesting season and the activities of the park be reduced during the nesting season; and hire a recognized naturalist to advise and supervise mitigation efforts. This consultant would review construction schedules and provide advice to the contractors in order to reduce the impact on park wildlife. EBRPD and the City, with California Splash paying the consultant fees, could appoint the consultant jointly. He believed that a percentage of the gate entrance fees should be set aside for continued mitigation efforts. He protested the expansion of the water park and believed the location was inappropriate. He believed there were other places in the Tri-Valley area that were more appropriate or acceptable for this type of development. He noted that EBRPD was not formed to become a profit center, and he wondered why a non-profit entity is being Pleasanton City Council 9 03/23/04 Minutes