CCMIN032304 - Laserfiche WebLink

3. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS Item 3a PAP-57 (PCUP-63/PDR-243)~ Glenn Kierstead~ California Splash LLC (SR 04:058) (CONTINUED FROM March 16, 2004) Appeal of the Planning Commlsslon's denial of applieatlons for eondltional use permit and design review approvals to expand the existing water park facilities and related improvements at Shadow Cliffs Regional Recreation Area located at 2500 and 3320 Stanley Boulevard. Zoning for the property is Public and Institutional (P) District. Mayor Pico continued the public hearing and public comments. Elle Surber, 4282 Croce Court, asked Council to expand the water park so that she may continue to have her birthday parties at the water slide facilities. Rebecca Fawns, 3581 Vineyard Avenue, said that she wanted the water slides to remain open, as it would provide more oppommities for youth to secure jobs. She wanted Council to approve the expansion of the existing water facilities because it would be safer and provide more exciting activity for the youth in the community. Emily McCloud, 495 Linden Way, said she wanted to keep the water slides open because it would provide a lot of entertainment for children. Pamela Fawns, 3581 Vineyard Avenue, wanted the water slides to be open because it is a good place for entertainment for children, and will also provide an opportunity for teenagers to secure employment. Wendy Fawns, 3581 Vineyard Avenue, encouraged Council to consider the outdoor activities that occur at the existing water park facilities. She believed that if the incidents that had occurred at the existing water park were compared to the incidents at the Fairgrounds, it would be found that the water slides are having a fair and positive impact on the community. She encouraged Council to continue to allow the children to attend the water park facilities as an outdoor, exercising opportunity for the entire family. Lynne Surber, 4282 Croce Court, believed the total cost involved in going to the movies exceeded the park entrance fee at the water park facilities for an entire day of entertainment. She wished that her children had a great place in the community to go. She was concerned about what would occur with the land if it did not become an expanded water park. She believed the expansion of the existing water park facilities would be a great addition to the City. Renee Rodola, 2991 Liberty Drive, said that her house was the closest to the water slide facilities. Her biggest concern with the expansion of the water slide facilities Pleasanton City Council 2 03/23/04 Minutes