Laserfiche WebLink
Chris Ann Giles, 1881 Cortez Court, HBA Executive Director for the eastern <br />division, noted that HBA has been working with the ACWMA and other local consultants <br />to try and come up with a Green Program that is builder driven and voluntary. As HBA <br />embarks on this mission and coordinates it Bay Area wide, it proposes that ordinances are <br />not pushed by cities, and that cities allow HBA to bring back through this working group <br />a program to adopt. This will allow HBA the opportunity to evaluate the best programs <br />and find the key point that brings together the marketing, green building, and the building <br />components with the cities and with other agencies. HBA believes this to be a more <br />dynamic approach in helping the builders to create some ownership on this program. <br />HBA is currently having a problem with marketing Green Building, as no one really <br />knows what it means. Southern California has a lot of success in marketing homes as <br />California "friendly homes." HBA believes that by incorporating this approach, it will <br />have much more success in the Bay Area to work with residential builders. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hostermanbelieved anumber ofbuilders were already on board. She <br />believed this was more of an education process. She also believed that more homebuyers <br />are becoming aware of the positive aspects of owing a home that is made to be a healthy <br />environment for families, and also a long lasting and substantial structure. She did not <br />believe this would be at odds with what HBA is looking for. She did see some value in at <br />least exploring putting together an ordinance, and she would like to move forward with it. <br /> <br /> Ms. Giles understood Ms. Hosterman's point of view. She noted that market <br />driven does not work well with mandates, and although there is a better understanding of <br />what Green Building is, there is not a real understanding of it when people go through the <br />components. Therefore, builders are pushing to be competitive with one another in order <br />to raise that educational standard and help create an entire market of people that <br />understand these programs. By working with a voluntarily program that is builder driven <br />as opposed to city mandates, cities are able to get that dynamic going and get the <br />competition between the builders to be able to pull in that buyer and educate them on the <br />features. HBA has seen this approach work in multiple jurisdictions. This approach has <br />been much more successful in being able to spread the program rather doing it ordinance <br />by ordinance. <br /> <br /> Matt Sullivan, 7882 Flagstone Drive, speaking as a member of the Planning <br />Commission and one of the original instigators of the Green Building activities in <br />Pleasanton, was very encouraged to see a representative of the HBA speaking in favor of <br />developing some type of Green Building Guidelines that developers could live with. He <br />believed the Green Point System as proposed by ACWMA is a good system. It is <br />effective and provides flexibility for builders to comply with Green Building Standards. <br />It also provides some sort of structure and a level playing field for people to work <br />towards. He noted that the Planning Commission spent an enormous amount of time <br />trying to negotiate with developers on the fly, how to get Green Building Measures put <br />into projects, which is not an effective way to do it from the Commission's standpoint. It <br />is also not effective for the builders because it is a surprise and they are not able to plan <br />upfront how they need to cost these jobs, and to understand what the requirements will <br />be. He has heard it mentioned many times by the developers that if the City informs <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 9 04/06/04 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />