Laserfiche WebLink
the tip of an iceberg ora new Council direction that disregards public input? The first <br />inkling came when Council pulled the public planning process for the Bernal property <br />and installed a design competition suited to Council's vision. He said this direction was <br />troubling. The Planning Commission, in the midst of a General Plan update, had many <br />hours of public input provided by many members of the community. As a Planning <br />Commissioner, he is committed to developing a General Plan recommendation that is <br />reflective of the community values. However, based on the failure of the process and the <br />number of controversial subjects discussed so far, he believed there might be a citizen <br />initiative or referendum on every contentious item in the General Plan. As a Planning <br />Commissioner, he will have a difficult time to ask the public to trust the process. <br /> <br /> Jerry Wagner, 6344 Alisal Street, addressed Council regarding a proposed <br />alternative for the bypass road. <br /> <br /> There was a presentation by Alameda County Supervisor Scott Haggerty and <br />Ellen Garvey, consultant, regarding the Clean Air Plan for the Tri-Valley Area. <br />Highlights of the presentation included the Clean Air Plan Goals, Tri-Valley Vehicle <br />Miles Traveled (VMT) per day, components of the Clean Air Plan, ozone and <br />particulates, voluntary measures, and plan access and contacts. Supervisor Haggerty <br />noted that if the Th-Valley area exceeds the federal ozone levels too many times, <br />Alameda County loses transportation funding. He noted that air pollution comes in from <br />the northwestern direction and the 1-880 corridor. The Clean Air Plan was developed <br />specifically for the Tri-Valley, recognizing the natural characteristics of weather and <br />topography, which make this valley one of the likeliest in the entire Bay Area to suffer <br />t~om air pollution. The Plan is designed to be a set of voluntary actions, which can be <br />taken by cities as well as other groups, which can augment the regulations adopted by the <br />Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), and assist in achieving the goal <br />of clean air. He requested Council review the Clean Air Plan and consider its adoption. <br />He acknowledged the City for reducing air pollution by adding a sustainability and <br />energy element to its General Plan, adopting the Wood Smoke ordinance, continuing the <br />Rides to School Program to reduce morning and aflemoon traffic congestion, and for <br />being recognized as 2003 Best Work Places for Commuters. He pointed out that the <br />City's new fire station received a leadership and energy and environmental development <br />award. <br /> <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> <br />Item 6a <br />PUD-79-02-12M/PADRA-916~ Steve and Laura Zuniga (SR 04:066) <br />Application for a major modification to an approved Planned Unit Development plan to <br />allow construction outside of the building envelope and for design review approval for an <br />approximately 15-foot high, 1,200-square-foot-detached second unit at 2350 Gloria <br />Court. Zoning for the property is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development - Low Density <br />Residential) District. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 6 04/06/04 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />