CCMIN021704 - Laserfiche WebLink

The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councllmember Campbell and Mayor Pico NOES: Councilmembers Ayala and Brozosky ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Councilmember Hosterman Mr. Brozosky asked legal staffto clarify what it meant when there was a tie vote. Mr. Roush said that the Planning Commission's decision would be upheld because there was no motion to overturn its decision. The Planning Commission's decision would stand unless there are three votes to do something different. Ms. Ayala said that staff's recommendation was deny the appeal but she wanted to uphold the appeal of the Hatlcers and approve the project. Mr. Campbell said that he wanted to be sensitive to the Hafkers, but at the same time, he believed there was a reason for Council codifying things. He would like for the Hafkers to be able to get an additional lot, but believed Council needed to be consistent. Ms. Ayaia pointed out that Council did approve the Moriera development of four lots instead of three lots. Mayor Pico indicated that the Moriera development was under a different set of circumstances. It was moved by Mr. Brozosky, and seconded by Mr. Campbell, to deny the Hafkers appeal but encourage the Hafkers to initiate a Specific Plan change in order to obtain the extra lot. Mayor Pico indicated that Mr. Brozosky's motion was basically the same as his previous motion. Mr. Campbell believed Mr. Brozosky's motion was stronger. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Brozosky, Campbell, and Mayor Pico NOES: Councilmember Ayala ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Councllmember Hosterman 6.__~c Development Review Process for Kottinger Hills, PUD -33. (SR 04:034) This matter was removed and continued indefinitely. Pleasanton City Council 27 02/17/04 Minutes