Laserfiche WebLink
Jerry Wagner, 6344 Alisal Street, addressed Council in opposition to approving <br />the Operator and Grow-In Agreements. <br /> <br /> Vanessa Kawaihau, 871 Sycamore Road, referred to Section 15.03, Eminent <br />Domain of the Operator Agreement. She asked under what elreumstanees staff foresees <br />this condition occurring? Does the City anticipate that the GE Plant will have to expand <br />its buffer zone? She referred to number nine, Reservation Policy, of the Policy and <br />Procedures which states the City may schedule use of the Course as a setting for official <br />business. She pointed out that the park is open during the summer until 9 p.m. She <br />anticipated several dinner functions occurring and requested that this section be clarified. <br />She referred to Section VI, School Play, numbers 5 and 8, which referred to team <br />practice. She suggested that students not drive Happy Valley Road, as she believed it to <br />be a dangerous route. She believed the Environmental Mitigation requirements were well <br />documented. She reminded Council of the November 2002 community meeting staff had <br />with the Happy Valley residents prior to the grading commencing. Residents raised <br />concerns that there was no baseline water monitoring for area wells downstream from the <br />golf course, which is particularly important for residents on Happy Valley Road who do <br />not have the option of hooking up to water should their wells eventually become <br />contaminated from an accident on the course. She pointed out that the residents directly <br />downstream from the golf course do not have an available option should a problem arise. <br />Should Happy Valley residents choose to golf at the Callippe Preserve Golf Course, she <br />asked how the reservation and fees would apply, as most of the residents are not residents <br />of the City. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush believed it would highly unlikely that another public agency would <br />want to condemn this property, but it could be possible that the County or Federal <br />government could want it at some point. The Eminent Domain provision provides what <br />will happen in the unlikely event that occurs. It is a "what if" provision and there would <br />have to be a showing that there would be a need for a more public use than what it is <br />currently used for. He believed this would be highly unlikely. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala requested clarification on Ms. Kawaihau's comments related to the <br />baseline monitoring for area wells downstream from the golf course. <br /> <br /> Mr. Rasmussen reported there is a water monitoring program that needs to be <br />implemented on site. If the City wanted additional monitoring offsite, he suggested that <br />it be scheduled as a separate item to have the engineers provide a proposal as to how it <br />might occur. Staffis ensuring, through its own monitoring, that problems will not be <br />created offsite, which is why the monitoring is occurring on site to ensure that any <br />potential problems are caught. <br /> <br /> In response to an inquiry by Ms. Ayala, Mr. Rasmussen stated that by the <br />monitoring being done on site, anything that seemed offwould translate to offsite. He <br />indicated that if there were no problems on site, there would be no way problems could <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 23 01/06/04 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />