Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Pico mentioned that recently, Council we <br />Civic Arts Commission for a piece of art in the sports p~ <br />a committee selecting a design. Model designs were pre <br />public input. Council received a lot of input, which ulti <br />choosing that particular design. This is the type of proc <br />ultimately throughout this entire process, Council had o <br />concept to a vote of the community. He wanted to ensu <br />the community would be approved. If a plan were pres, <br />all of the sports associations and families that have you! <br />opposition, it would fail. He wanted to ensure that Cou <br />the community in this process. <br /> <br /> Before Mr. Campbell could agree to support the <br />hearing the wording in the form of a motion. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky asked what would be the appropfi <br />several items on which he believed Council needed to <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico proposed that several motions be r <br />address the structure of the competition, as outlined by <br />motion would be related to the permitted uses for the B <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mayor Pico, seconded by M <br />establish a design competition for the Bernal proper <br />professional designers to provide two designs: one ¢ <br />unconstrained design based on the designer's imagh <br />any constraints that Council and staff placed on the <br />would incorporate, at a minimum, the first two field <br />that Council and the Parks and Recreation Commis <br />desired, the professional designers could include Ph: <br /> <br /> For clarification purposes, Mr. Brozosky asked <br />motion that would require the professional designers to <br />included, at a minimum, Phase I in its current location. <br />also choose to provide another proposal that illustrated <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell asked if Mayor Pico's motion jm, <br />did the motion include the entire Phase I plan? <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala indicated that Mayor Pico's motion <br />fields and parking layouts, but the professional designe <br />I in its entirety. She was concerned that parking, as cm <br />the sports fields. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 15 <br />Minutes <br /> <br />at through a process with the <br />rk. Designs were submitted with <br />:sented to the public to allow for <br />nately ended with Council not <br />.~ss he envisioned, and noted that <br />~mmitted to putting a final <br />'e that whatever was presented to <br />ated to the community that had <br />involved in sports in <br />~cil incorporated a key portion of <br /> <br />matter, he was interested in <br /> <br />ate way to proceed, as there were <br />)vide more detailed direction. <br /> <br />[e. One motion would be to <br />he staffreport, and the other <br />,~mal property. <br /> <br />· . Brozosky, to direct staff to <br />~y, which requested the <br />esign would be an <br />ration and analysis, including <br />~rocess; the second design <br />and parking layout of Phase I <br />ion had reviewed, and if <br />tse I in its entirety. <br /> <br />?or a minor modification to the <br />provide one design, which <br />The professional designers could <br />anconstrained ideas. <br /> <br />included the two sports fields, or <br /> <br /> tcluded, at a minimum, the two <br />:s have the option to include Phase <br />rently presented, was built around <br /> <br />12/2/03 <br /> <br /> <br />