CCMIN100703 - Laserfiche WebLink

are the floor area restrictions and the lack of Green Building requirements. He agreed with comments made by staff related to the floor area ratio. If the PUD were followed with a large two-acre lot and large setback and the minimum house size, you will get a house that maintains the rural nature of the area. He pointed out that his property is right next to the golf course property. These will be four to five thousand square foot homes on half-acre lots. Those, along with the new large homes in Bridle Creek that are very large houses on smaller lots, will both be more visually massive than any house that is built on a two-acre lot that conforms to the current PUD. He was in favor of the Green Building requirements, which he plans on using, as he believed it was the right thing to do. He also believed there is a right place to legislate those, such as in an ordinance that applies at the time of the building permit rather than putting this requirement in the PUD. If this is placed in the PUD, he believed that those who come in to prezone in years to follow will be building to outdated standards and outdated building practices. In closing, he strongly agreed that the guidelines are sufficient as set forth and are appropriate for controlling the nature of new development with the intent of preserving the rural nature of Happy Valley. Sandy Richert, 5357 Falrweather Court, concurred with Mr. Adam's comments. She indicated that she had sent a letter to the Mayor and Council a few days ago which summed up her thoughts in the matter. She mentioned that she and her husband are in the process of trying to purchase the three acres from Mr. Adams to raise their family. She has read through the Happy Valley Specific Plan and the development guidelines, and noted that there is nothing in there that they are opposed to. She mentioned that she grew up in a rural area and is looking forward to raising her children in this type of environment. She was in favor of the Green Building guidelines and agreed with staff's comments regarding floor area ratio. She supported staff's recommendation and urged Council to move forward. Clive Schliewe, 6330 Laura Lane, concurred with the previous speakers' comments. Since the parcels under discussion in this plan are part of unincorporated Alameda County rather than part of the City, he failed to understand why a plan was being discussed to control development in their community. He asked if the City is planning to continue encouraging annexation. He formally requested the City to review and revise the design guidelines and process for this designation of the Happy Valley Specific Plan. He also requested the City increase the noticing area from 300 feet to 1,000 feet. He also requested that the Planning Commission review and approve ail custom home designs. He was very concerned about the size and style of future homes to be built. He believed that a floor area ratio for the main residence is important in preventing very large homes, such as 6,000 square feet or mom from being built on these parcels resulting in destroying the semi-rural character. With the exception of the huge Greenbriar homes in Happy Valley, he believed most homes in the Happy Valley area are relatively modest in size. He relayed to Council that it was his understanding when he first moved into Happy Valley that the north side of Sycamore was supposed to blend in with the south side of Sycamore and to maintain the same semi-rural look. Currently there are five to six bedroom, 6,000 foot homes and they do not look like the other side of the street and do not blend into the rural area. He expressed his concern regarding the Pleasanton City Council 25 10/07/03 Minutes