Laserfiche WebLink
bringing these changes to Council. The PDA has a parking subcommittee and ail of their <br />work has gone through the Economic Restmctur/ng Committee and through the Board <br />and then to the Planning Commission. She noted that they have put in countless hours <br />and made sure that everyone effected by these changes have been involved in the process. <br />She asked for Council's consideration in approving the ordinance. <br /> <br /> Peter MacDonald, 400 Main Street, Suite 210, Vice President of the Pleasanton <br />Downtown Association Board, noted that he was a member of the Parking Committee, a <br />member of the Economic Restructuring Committee and the Board of the PDA. He <br />supported the amendments as written and aiso supported the clarification provided in the <br />memo this evening. He thanked members of the Parking Committee who spent a <br />tremendous amount of time on this matter, and noted that they are also in support of the <br />parking amendments. He mentioned that they would be working with staffto try and <br />develop a program to encourage employees to park away from the close in spaces and <br />allow the retail customers to use the spaces. From the Downtown Association <br />perspective, their overall goal was for parking to increase the critical mass of the <br />downtown. He pointed out that side street and second story development will be needed <br />as well, and for people to rebuild buildings that are aiready in existence. He was aware <br />of investors who wish to do some major and minor redevelopment projects but mentioned <br />that they are waiting until they can obtain a clear set of roles. The general principal they <br />have applied to this is that new development needs to bring new parking with it, some of <br />which may be in the form of an assessment district and some in parking sharing or in-lieu <br />agreements. The concept is to keep an aggregate supply of parking growing as fast as the <br />aggregate demand of parking is growing. He mentioned that there is severe opposition <br />for the concept for mandatory first floor retail by downtown property owners. Their <br />reasoning is that in the bad times the towns that have mandatory first floor retail end up <br />with empty buildings and the owners still have to make their mortgage payment every <br />month. This might actually discourage some of the building that might get done if the <br />five-year rule is changed. <br /> <br /> Judy Wheeler Ditter, 5541 Black Avenue, owner of Towne Center Books, noted <br />that she was a member of the Parking Committee. She was excited about the proposal <br />and pointed out that public perception was very important, and believed that the <br />modifications to the ordinance would work well for the property owners, employees and <br />customers. She formaily requested Council's support. <br /> <br /> Vera Revelli, 4725 First Street, Suite 245, a property owner in the downtown, <br />mentioned that she is another member of the Parking Committee. She asked for <br />Council's support for the revised ordinance. <br /> <br /> Gene Finch, 4847 Dry Wood Street, a property owner in the downtown, <br />congratulated the Pleasanton Downtown Association for the fine work it did. He <br />encouraged Council to take affirmative action on the proposed ordinance. He aiso <br />encouraged them to follow through to allow for additionai parking on the Railroad <br />Corridor. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 21 10/07/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />