Laserfiche WebLink
spending its time on this Act. It was passed by Congress, ratified by the Senate and signed by <br />the President. All these people can be contacted and it is their business, not the City Council's. <br />Council was elected to shape the future of Pleasanton, not pass judgment on laws passed by <br />Congress. The preamble of the Constitution includes the words "provide for the common <br />defense". Defending ourselves against terrorists is important. He noted many recent terrorist <br />activities and said this law was adopted to stop more murders. Law-abiding citizens have <br />nothing to fear from it. It is known terrorists use the Interact to communicate. It allows roving <br />wire taps, so the government can follow suspected terrorists instead of just one phone line. It <br />gives the Attorney General authority to obtain foreign student information. Some of the 9/11 <br />hijackers were in this country on fraudulent student visas. If someone is planning an attack on <br />the United States, he wanted the government to know about it before another American gets <br />killed. The Patriot Act may be inconvenient, but so is a lock on the front door. <br /> <br /> Mike Duarte, 6665 Singletree Way, said he strongly supported option 1 of the staff <br />report, but also supported option 3. He definitely did not support option 2 because this is not a <br />local issue. The Patriot Act was a measured response during a time of crisis in our country that <br />was given a sunset clause. It lowers the threshold for investigation, but does not change the <br />conviction threshold. People must still go through a court of law under the same rules. Council <br />is not elected to represent its citizens on federal issues. When campaigning, debate was <br />restricted to local issues and candidates were not asked about military spending, federal taxes, <br />etc. His son is serving in Iraq, but he did not ask Council to support the troops or to support the <br />war. Council recently pushed the Constitutional limits with its teen drinking ordinance, which he <br />believed allows search of a house for alcohol without a warrant. He felt it would be hypocritical <br />for Council to tell the Federal government that it is stepping over the line with the Patriot Act. <br />Council does a good job on local issues. <br /> <br />There were no further speakers on this item. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Brozosky, seconded by Mr. Campbell, to adopt Resolution No. <br />03-092, approving Option 3 directing staff to prepare a resolution and letter to <br />Pieasanton's Congressional representatives supporting the Freedom to Read Protection <br />Act (HR 1157, Sanders) and the Library and Bookseller Act (SB 1158, Boxer) both of <br />which exempt libraries and bookstores from Section 215 of the Patriot Act; in addition <br />directing staff to prepare a resolution in support of the resolutions of the American Library <br />Association and the California Library Association concerning the Patriot Act. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell said he teaches Civics at Amador High School and one of his favorite <br />topics is the Constitution. He hates the Patriot Act. He felt it was one of the worst pieces of <br />legislation ever. He stated he was a locally elected official and it was troubling for him not to <br />take a stand. He commended the Library Commission and wanted to fully support its action. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 20 08/05/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />