My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN080503
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCMIN080503
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:37 AM
Creation date
7/29/2003 3:29:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/6/2003
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN080503
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Hosterman clarified that the scope of the study area is actually more comprehensive <br />than the four little pictures in the report. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico agreed and referred to prior handouts given to Council. He agreed all that <br />has been narrowed to these four alternatives. The BART Board does not support BART down <br />the median, but that doesn't mean the Policy Advisory Committee has to accept that <br />recommendation. There are other alternatives to be considered and each has its own problems. <br /> <br />There were no further public speakers. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky asked if ACE service was considered? <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico said it was but it did not take p~ple where they wanted to go. About 17% of <br />the commuters went to San Jose and the rest went to Hacienda Business Park or up to Bishop <br />Ranch. There is a great deal of traffic going through the Tri-Valley area to other areas like <br />Oakland, Walnut Creek, etc. A significant portion of the traffic ends in the Tri-Valley area. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Ayala, seconded by Mr. Brozosky, to direct representative Pico <br />not to support including Option 1 as an alternative to be studied by BART. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Counciimembers - Ayala, Brozosky, Hosterman, and Mayor Pieo <br />NOES: Councilmember Campbell <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Ms. Hosterman was concerned about narrowing the scope of the study, although she was <br />confident that diesel trains would never travel on the Iron Horse Trail. She wanted an expansive <br />study, but did not want to raise concerns among the residents. She would like to expand the <br />scope of the study for any viable option including additional information on the ACE train. She <br />wanted to know what would happen if the same amount of money set aside for the DMU option <br />were applied to ACE service expansion. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell disagreed with taking it out as an option. He felt it was better if the <br />decision were not only a political decision, but also an economic decision, and that could not be <br />determined without the study. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky felt it could be found to be a less expensive solution and then it would be a <br />harder battle to take it out of consideration. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico had no difficulty removing it as an option. He wanted to send a clear signal <br />that the residents of Pleasanton did not want the diesel train on the Iron Horse Trail. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky expressed concern about the ACE train. A way must be found to bring <br />people from San Joaquin County to the Tri-Valley or to Walnut Creek. There is already a track <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 15 08/05/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.