CCMIN071503 - Laserfiche WebLink

people who moved in specifically to take advantage of large lots to increase the size of the houses. He felt they were only concerned about making more money from their homes. That is the wrong thing to establish neighborhoods upon. A cohesive community is based on talking m neighbors, developing a plan that works for everyone. He believed Mr. Crofion will move in the furore and is doing this to take maximum advantage of increasing the value of his house. Mr. Brozosky asked what relationship he had with the Diazes. Mr. Couto said he worked with them. Karen Boyd, 302 Kottinger Drive, was sad this process has come to this, with neighbor pitted against neighbor. She did not feel that the people who have lived in the neighborhood since it was first built and plan to retire in the area are being taken into consideration. She objected to the massiveness of the addition being proposed and supported the Diaz's appeal. They are her parents and she lived in the home for a long time. Their hobby is gardening and they plan to live out their years there. A huge wall will be unsightly for her parents. Once again million dollar homes are being built in Pleasanton and it is losing housing for the children of residents to be able to stay in town and raise their own children. Barbara Bacon, 4898 Cobbler Court, spoke in support of the Diaz appeal. She said the Crofton design looks lovely, but she will not be seeing it every day in her backyard. She does not know either family, but has spoken with both families. She noted the original developers had suggested 480 sq. fr. additions over the garage. That is what had been set forth in the CC&Rs. She noted the Crofron addition to the garage is 949 sq. fr., which is almost twice the original recommendation. Just because there are precedents in the neighborhood for larger homes does not make it right. The Diazes are the only affected neighbors. She said her lot is 16,000 sq. fr. and if she followed the FAR ratio of 40%, she could have a 6,000 sq. fr. on her lot. Council mentioned earlier about changing the zoning and she felt that FAR should be revised and the actual square footage should be considered, not a percentage. John S chabacker, 1139 Mataro Court, said he was not a resident of Old Towne, but did support the Crofron application. He thought it was a good idea that the Crofrons had shared their plans with the neighbors before taking the application directly to the Planning Depmhnent. He said the Crofrons had told him there was one neighbor particularly opposed to the plan. Mr. Schabacker tried to put himself in the place of the Crofrons, a family outgrowing its current home, and the Diazes, long-time residents who would have to deal with the addition and change from what they have been used to. The majority of the neighborhood supports the Crofton plan. He drove through the development and is familiar with the Crofron plans. He felt it was consistent with other homes in the neighborhood and will add value to the neighborhood. He thought about how the Croftons had gone through the planning process and he has heard how difficult that can be. He liked the fact that City staffis careful in their considerations of projects and try to do the best for the other residents. The Planning staff approved the plan with a few modifications, the Planning Commission approved the plan, with some minor modifications. It is now up to the City Council. He trusted that Council would make a decision based on the facts, the recommendations of staffand the Planning Commission. He hoped the Crofrons would get approval for their project. Pleasanton City Council 18 07/15/03 Minutes