CCMIN041503 - Laserfiche WebLink

The public hearing was opened Patricia Belding, 7703 Highland Oaks Drive, expressed the support of the Citizens for a Caring Community for the revised housing element that has been worked out. They are all aware that it has taken much work, rework, comment, analysis, and patience on the part of staff and housing advocates as well as Commissions and Committees to get to this place. The Housing Element Committee and staff worked hard on previous drafts for almost 2 years, but still were not able to resolve some key questions. The election of November 2002 regarding using some of the Bemai Property for affordable housing settled that specific issue, but created community divisions. The Citizens for a Caring Community is pleased to see the Council committing the City to considering the whole city housing map and coming up with some flexible and feasible plans for the next three years. Citizens for a Caring Community has put before the Council some details that might be needed to the Housing Element. These new programs, 19.3 and 19.4, are taken from the April 3, 2003 letter from the Department of Housing and Community Development notifying the City of the Department's conditional certification of Pleasanton's revised Housing Element. They request and hope that the Council will incorporate these additional monitoring reporting and remedial programs. The Council's formal adoption of these new programs actions which HCD is requiring of the City as conditions for its certification will leave no doubt as to Pleasanton's commitment to meeting the housing needs of the community. It will also add specificity to the monitoring timetable making Pleasanton's plans for providing affordable housing more effective. She asked for Council approval of the Revised Housing Element with these additional programs. Kurt Wiest, 1594 Loganberry Way, Housing Commissioner Chairperson, said their action and discussion of the Housing Element Update is a matter of record, referring to the minutes of the December 19, 2002 meeting. Essentially their major concern was the production goals especially as they relate to low and very low income households. They believe that those production goals stated in the Housing Element Update are unrealistic, given the housing cap constraints and the urban growth boundary constraints. He would like to encourage Council in adopting the Housing Element Update that they consider some specific mechanisms to ensure that there is going to be monitoring of the goals that are being established; insuring there are frequent reports on the City's progress in meeting the goals that are there; insuring the information on those periodic updates on goals is conveyed to the various commissions and other individuals that are involved with the progress of this. We have set these goals and want to make sure these goals are met. Ms. Ayala asked if the Housing Commission discussions have covered the fact that the State mandate is unfunded? This is one of the stumbling blocks of what the City is working with and it did not look like the State was going to be coming up with any sort of extra money in the near future. Mr. Wiest said they were aware of the unfunded mandates. They understand this and there is also talk of the possibility of lawsuits. Every city in the state that comes up Pleasanton City Council 15 04/15/03 Minutes