CCMIN040103 - Laserfiche WebLink

making a phone call to a kid's parent, or making the kid call their parent. She said she is trying to understand where that falls apart. Chief Neal said a high percent of the times they are in the home, but this ordinance gives the police a gateway that is very marginal. The problem is that a kid could just say no, he refuses to identify themselves. People can be very uncooperative in these circumstances and the police have no legal authority to force them to identify themselves, no technical legal authority to even seize the alcohol. They leave the residence with their tail between their legs and hope for the best outcome, keeping an eye on the neighborhood, hoping that nobody leaves with a DUI and trying to keep some resources there to monitor the situation until the party breaks up. This is a link that will keep the kids from continuing to drink and subsequently leaving the house in cars. Mayor Pico opened the Public Heating on the item. Bonnie Radford, 2050 Cotterell Court, Youth Commission Chairperson, wanted to let the Council know the commission has met and discussed the amendment with the police department and voted unanimously to support it. They also felt the issue came down to safety and the commission saw the amendment as an important means of keeping the community safe and keeping their peers safe. They felt it would deter parties where there would be alcohol. A Youth Master Plan goal is to keep Pleasanton youth healthy and they feel this is a way to accomplish that goal. The commission understands there the perpetual straggle between the rights of the individual versus the rights of society, but the commission feels this amendment is necessary to help put an end to the problem of teen drinking and to keep the community safe. This also gives the Pleasanton Police Department another tool to divert kids from the criminal justice system by being able to handle this, as Chief Neal has already discussed. Overall the commission supports this and the Pleasanton Police Department and urged the Council to pass this ordinance. Debra Block, 8506 Lupine Court, spoke as a mother of four teen-age children and the President of the Alameda Chapter of Mothers Against Drank Driving (MADD). MADD supports zero tolerance regarding under age drinking. This proposed ordinance will go a long way in sending the message to young people that consuming alcohol under the age of 21 will not be tolerated. We spend a lot of time talking to youth about the dangers of drinking and also drinking and driving. The police need to be able to do more when they see young people consuming alcohol in homes. She has four teen age children and while her husband and she are vigilant about what their children are doing, they also want to give them some freedom because they have developed trust in them. If she received a phone call that her child was at a home consuming alcohol, they would deal with that child. But if the police could not call them because of the existing ordinance and the child later drove impaired or got in a car with an impaired driver and was killed or injured, she would be very angry. People's judgment is impaired when they consume alcohol. She knows first hand what happens in drank driving crashes because she not only provides emotional support to families who have lost loved ones in drank driving crashes, she experienced a tragedy of a drank driving crash nearly 12 years ago when her Pleasanton City Council 15 04/01/03 Minutes