CCMIN031803 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Duggan has been required to do the same things over and over again and conditions have been imposed to make certain he does things in a reasonable time frame. Each time he has missed those time frames. The neighbors keep showing up for these meetings and Mr. Duggan never does. Mr. MacDonald said if Mr. Duggan had been there, he would like to apologize to the neighbors. Mr. Kennedy said that was laughable. He has lived in the neighborhood for five years and on many occasions Mr. Duggan has passed by with no response to him. Many neighbors have attempted talking to Mr. Duggan and he has closed the door on them. He has made no attempt to communicate with the neighbors. There have been several statements that Mr. Duggan felt if he built the porch it would interfere with his plans to build a larger porch in the future. Any cost associated with building the porch or having to redo anything is entirely his own fault because he did not obtain permits to start the work in the first place. He believed the cost of adding a porch, fixing the stucco, and generally cleaning up the house and landscaping is probably less than Mr. Duggan paid for his counsel to come to this meeting. Instead of asking Mr. Duggan to do these things as part of the condition for approval, Mr. Kennedy preferred that Mr. Duggan be required to finish the items in the December 7, 2001 letter before he gets approval for the additions. He just has to build the porch and do a little general painting and landscaping. If that were to happen, all the neighbors would be happy to see the addition. They have no objection to the size. It is just the fact that it has taken him seventeen years to get this far. He suggested Council make a motion that Mr. Duggan must meet the conditions of the 2001 letter before he gets any approval to move forward. Ms. Ayala expressed the concern of the Council and felt it would be helpful for speakers to suggest specific conditions. For instance, can Council require him to hire a contractor? Ms. McKeehan said it is legal, but it would not mean anything. She pointed out that if work is done without a building permit and the City discovers this, the property owner is required to pay a much higher fee to get the permit. That is the only penalty she is aware of. Mr. Kennedy urged Council to deny the application until certain conditions are met. If Mr. Duggan has money to spend on the house, why not spend a little up front to make it presentable to the neighborhood. He was not suggesting a massive amount of work, but felt most of this could be accomplished relatively cheaply. John Mannion, 3570 Kings Canyon Court, said that in 1998 there were no windows in the Duggan house for about six months. He called code enforcement in January 1998 and it is very difficult to get anyone to do anything. The neighbors have used every channel and have been very patient. They have attended every meeting they have been asked to attend. He asked Council to deny the request and require Mr. Duggan to do what is stated in the December 7, 2001 letter. Ms. Ayala asked about conditions. There have been four meetings at which Mr. Duggan has been given conditions and he has not met them. Mr. MacDonald said a person should be able to improve their home. Mr. Duggan was given permission by the City to do this and he let it lapse. There have been references in the staff report about making some progress or finishing in a timely manner and allowing another six months to do something. Mr. Mannion was not comfortable that. Nothing has led him to believe that will actually happen. Actions speak louder than words and what Mr. Duggan has not done speaks louder than what Mr. MacDonald can present in a few minutes at this meeting. There is a lot of pride of ownership in the Pleasanton City Council 33 03/18/03 Minutes