Laserfiche WebLink
everything it can through the water quality management program to improve the water <br />quality for everyone in the region. This is why Zone 7 is encouraging the individual <br />retailer to make the same changes that Zone 7 is in order to improve the water quality for <br />everybody in the valley <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if he concurred that growth was paying for itself. Is there a <br />decrease in quality because of growth? <br /> <br /> Mr. Marchand said he did absolutely concurred. It is a stated policy for Zone 7 <br />for almost as long as he has been on the Board. He said there has been no decrease in <br />water quality because of growth because Zone 7 did change the amount of water taken <br />from the groundwater basin. In a gallon of water, there is approximately 1.2 grams of <br />hardness. Every gallon that is pumped out of the basin has this hardness removed. What <br />is recharged into the basin is State project water which has a hardness of approximately <br />280 milligrams per gallon or approximately one quarter. For every gallon pumped out, <br />Zone 7 is charging the basin with less hard water. A decision was made as part of an <br />early implementation of the salt management plan to increase the pumping of the <br />groundwater basin to remove more salt to allow for greater recharge with softer State <br />project water and remove the salts from the basin. It is called conjunctive use. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayala asked about the quality of the water. <br /> <br /> Mr. Marchand said Water Factory 21 found after 30 years of recharging waste <br />water it was were creating NDMA, N-Nitroso Dimethylamine, a known carcogenics <br />going into the groundwater basin as 60 times the action level for the State of California. <br />It grossly contaminated the groundwater basin. They were not looking for it and now that <br />they are looking for it, they are using UV to remove it in its formation. Zone 7 does not <br />have NDMA at 135 parts per billion in the water. He was at a Cai Poly water conference <br />recently and spoke about this program. There were groups of engineers talking about <br />potable and non-potable use and they agreed that RO is a technology that works. There is <br />no problem with the technology if it works. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cusenza clarified that the City of Pleasanton wells now match the chlorine <br />levels in those of Zone 7. That information was not included in the staff report. <br /> <br /> Mr. Marchand said this has been a cooperative process over the last two years, <br />taking comments and working together and solving these problems. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hosterman said she felt it important to tackle the earthy, musty, chlorine <br />tasting water and she is concerned about the health and safety of the water. She knows <br />that trying to measure for different contaminants is not easy. She asked about <br />cryptosporidium and target reduction of contaminant levels. One way of meeting this is <br />to maintain the filtered water effluent turbidity below a specified low level and to assure <br />a greater removal with a second process, such as ultraviolet disinfection, which is <br />recommended to provide multi-barrier protection. How much does this cost and are we <br />doing it? <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 15 03/04/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />