Laserfiche WebLink
attendees to the event. It celebrated community connections and the Chamber wanted the <br />residents to know the impact of business on the community in terms of quaiity of life. He <br />described the speakers and then thanked the City staff, especially Gail Gilpin, who served on thc <br />steering committee, for making this event such a success. <br /> <br /> Otis Nostrand echoed the sentiments regarding Ms. Michelotti and Ms. Dennis. He then <br />urged the community to shop locally and support Pleasanton businesses. <br /> <br /> Patricia Belding, 7703 Highland Oaks Drive, thanked Ms. Dennis and Ms. Michelotti for <br />their efforts on behalf of Citizens for a Caring Community, the committee that advocated 15 <br />acres on the Bemal property for affordable housing. She has known Ms. Michelotti since their <br />daughters were young, through gifts soccer, and during her Planning Commission service. It was <br />a pleasure working with Ms. Dennis advocating affordable housing. <br /> <br /> Tim Kleffman, 5073 Lynbrook Court, also thanked Ms. Dennis and Ms. Michelotti for <br />their years of service for the community. He especially thanked Ms. Dennis for her support on <br />school facilities issues. He asked Council for its continued support of school facilities. He stated <br />that K-5 enrollment is 6,074 divided among nine schools. That is in excess of the General Plan <br />target of 600 students per neighborhood school. He noted there is no neighborhood school for <br />the east side of Pleasanton. The high schools are at 2,000 students and there are no plans for <br />future construction of new high school facilities. There are many portable classrooms on <br />campuses and more to be added. The School Board indicated the classroom capacity is at 97%, <br />but that is misleading because it includes the portables. Council has worked with the District to <br />solve problems regarding facilities. Most recently it helped solve the infrastructure problem that <br />would allow the construction of Neal Elementary to go forward. Unfortunately, a motion before <br />the School Board to proceed immediately with construction of Neal School failed. He believed <br />operating costs were not an issue for the school in the current budget and Signature Properties <br />has signed an agreement to advance $8.5 million to build the school. He believed the money to <br />open Neal is available in various facilities funds within the District, so money is not an issue, yet <br />the District is talking about an opening date of 2005. He believed the City was party to a <br />contract that indicated the school would open in 2002, however the District is delaying <br />construction. He asked Council to do what it can to make sure the school facilities are built. He <br />felt strictly supporting the School Board has failed to deliver the needed facilities. He urged <br />Council to support the community to get these facilities. It will benefit not only the children, but <br />also the developers who need school capacity to serve children from new developments. He <br />asked the City to participate with the District in negotiations with Signature Properties relative to <br />the $8.5 million commitment for the school. He believed the Agreement required approval of all <br />three parties for any change to the $8.5 million commitment and the City should be involved in <br />negotiations from the beginning. He urged Council to do what it can to make certain facilities <br />are constructed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala acknowledged the Council and School Board are two separately elected <br />bodies. She asked the City Attorney to explain how the City is part of the referenced agreement <br />and what action Council can take. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 5 11 / 19/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />