CCMIN111902 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Balch said yes he would be allowed five acre parcels. The sewer has always been the main issue. He would like to build homes for his children. He referred to the prior green building discussions and noted he probably has the only home in Pleasanton with a geothermal heating and air conditioning system. He would like to work with staffon this, but the current wording of the policy appears to require him to annex to the City before discussing what could be done on the property. Ms. Michelotfi asked what would happen if he went back to the County for review. Mr. Balch was not certain. He could try to convince the Board that his septic system was superior to the City sewer system. Mayor Pico said he still had the ability to build one additional house on the property. Ms. Ayala asked where the two proposed houses would be located on the property? Mr. Balch said at a lower elevation than his home. There is a line that goes across his property, around the golf course property, and over to the New Cities property. In order for him to get two lots, there has to be four acres below that line. On certain City documents the line is drawn so he has three and three-quarter acres and on other City documents the line is drawn so he has four acres. Ms. Michelotti asked where his home is located. Mr. Balch said it is outside the Urban Growth Boundary Line by about 75-100 feet. Vanessa Kawaihau, 871 Sycamore Road, noted that the Happy Valley community was not noticed on this item. Since the arrangements for the core infrastructure to be provided by the developers in the event of annexation has disappeared, she asked if it could be assumed that the extra houses given to those developers also disappear? She was glad it was made clear that the connection fees are included in the $34,000 to $50,000 costs. She was concerned that the water costs of the Sycamore Road infrastructure was not finalized. She asked why not. The infrastructure has been in the middle of the road for a few years now and some one should know what the constmefious costs were. She was also enneerned about the quoted estimate for the lateral only on Sycamore Road. There was a letter sent to property owners quoting a much lower cost and it wasn't an estimate. Ms. Michelotti asked who was noticed on this item. She also inquired about the letter referred to by Ms. Kawaihau. Mr. Grubstick was uncertain about the noticing. He said the letter referred to the infrastructure constructed by Greenbriar in Sycamore Road. That included laterals to each of the properties on Sycamore Road and Greenbriar had indicated to each of those property owners what the cost would be for extending those laterals to the property line. That was a set amount of money established by CJreonbriar. As far as other infrastructure costs along Sycamore, staffhas Pleasanton City Council 29 11 / 19/02 Minutes