CCMIN100102 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Michelotti referred to the fact that there is $8.1 million on account for this and asked how much can be built for that amount of money. Mr. Wolfe said not very much based on the desires of the Task Force. Staffprefers not to do phased projects, but that may be necessary based on the amount of funding available. There has been a history of phased projects such as the Sports Park, the Tennis Park, etc. No action was required on this agenda item. Item 6e PAP-37 (PSP-3 and PUD-82-10-1M, Allen Roberts and Robert Grove) Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying a General Plan conformity. determination~ Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan Amendment~ and PUD development plan modification to reconfigure the lots located at 24~ 27~ and 28 Grey Eagle Court and the City. of Pleasanton's Bonde II water tank property, in order to relocate the Itt and building envelope area at 24 Grey Eagle Court to generally south of the water tank site, to develop general design criteria for the new lot, and to expand the building envelope area for 28 Grey Eagle Court. This item was continued to 10/15/02. 7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL Ms. Michelotti asked for a follow up report on the Marque Club. She referred to a memo that the owner does not intend to renew the lease of the Marque. There have also been reports of noise complaints from the hotel since the access to the club was moved to the other side. She asked if Council would entertain initiating the process to remove the conditional use permit for that property so this kind of problem could not occur in the future. Mr. Roush suggested that the current use be allowed to go out before initiating such a process. He suggested bringing back a change to the conditional use permit in December or January. He did not want to provide grounds for litigation for the current lessee. Ms. Michelotti did not want to revoke the permit for the Marque, but for the underlying conditional use permit that runs with the property. She felt that use permit could be removed effective December 1. There was supposed to be a status report on the Marque and they were supposed to be obeying all the regulations, which they have not done. She wanted Council to act as quickly as possible to let the property owner know that that conditional use permit is no longer on the property and the owner can go forward and get a more compatible use for the neighborhood. Ms. Dennis said the conditional use permit is part of the entitlement for the property and has been there for a long time before the current use presented its problems. She would like to Pleasanton City Council 27 10/01/02 Minutes