CCMIN082202SP - Laserfiche WebLink

that was that it would cause more residential cut through traffic. From an environmental standpoint, the best way to reduce automotive emissions is to create the smoothest flow possible once the traffic is moving, instead of lots of starts and stops. With regard to moving the metering farther up the street, that was an option. The only downside he saw was that in calculating how many more cars would be stored on Sunol between the freeway and Sycamore, it would increase the delay getting into town by about four minutes. The only negative impact would be on the residents who use that route to get home. He believed the traffic would still back up to the freeway. However, with traffic there is always a balance; once traffic delay gets to seven minutes maybe cut through traffic will go a different way. There is always that dynamic in play. Because it only involves changing some signal timing and moving three signs, he would be willing to trying it at Sycamore to see the effect. If the citizens most affected supported moving the metering to Sycamore, he would try it. However, he felt it would only be a temporary improvement and traffic will back to the freeway again. Joann Roush, Crestablanca Drive, spoke for her husband, who drives 680 daily, and her daughter, who lives off San Carlos Way. She said they both support the metering on Sunol. He finds the traffic to be smoother and her daughter feels it is safer to enter and exit her neighborhood. Before the metering, cars would fly down Sunol and there is a curve which prevents seeing cars coming around the corner. If cars have to stop at the signal, it slows them. Mrs. Roush also supported the metering. She felt she could cross town better, and can make left turns easier onto her daughter's street or into the shopping center. Jennifer Hosterman, 2922 Chardonnay Drive, said she had met Mr. Knowles at the metering location one evening and she witnessed the traffic backing onto the freeway only a couple of times. She asked if them were a sign on the freeway warning motorists of the metering, would that be a deterrent? She noticed that when traffic backed up to the freeway, there was a rnoment when drivers could see traffic on the offramp and she saw several cars keep going on the freeway. Since the metering was started in the summer months, she asked if there would be more traffic as September arrives and will that make a difference? She was also curious about metering on the other side of town. She asked about metering the morning traffic on Stanley coming into Pleasanton at Isabel. She was concerned about traffic moving to Isabel and down Vineyard, which is already impacted. Mr. Knowles said a freeway sign might discourage some drivers and alert them to the traffic. In regard to the summer traffic counts, staff is aware that the numbers are fewer and also noted the economic downtown and they expect Sunol traffic volumes to increase as the economy improves. One of the reasons the traffic numbers were released immediately before the metering and immediately after the metering started, was to show the effect of the metering and not because of the effects of an economic down turn. In terms of Isabel, he said that traffic signal is controlled by Livermore, so Pleasanton staff could not meter that signal. The Vineyard Corridor to some extent is already self-metered because there is a four-way stop at Montevino and the road has a limited inbound capacity. The other issue is that Signature Properties was required to install a traffic signal at Ruby Hill when it meets signal warrants. That intersection now meets the signal warrants and the signal will be installed. That would be the ideal place to meter inbound traffic using the Vineyard Corridor. It would not impact those trying to access Ruby Hill, but would control those trying to come in to Pleasanton on Vineyard from the east. Pleasanton City Council Special Meeting Minutes 7 08/22/02