Laserfiche WebLink
conditions of approval last fall. It was a quiet winter, but this spring problems started and <br />continued despite Police and Code Enforcement verbal and written comments. May, June and <br />July had problems virtually every weekend up until the Planning Commission hearing. <br /> <br />Mayor Pico declared the public heating open. <br /> <br /> Mark Cohen, attorney for Carlos Ratinho and the Marque Club, asked for confirmation <br />that his letters of August 19 and August 30 had been received and were a matter of record. He <br />was assured they had been received. <br /> <br /> He noted that Capt. Radford had not spoken with Officer Parker since the Planning <br />Commission meeting. The assertion that 75% of the patrol force had been used for the Marque <br />applied before the Planning Commission meeting, not after it. This past weekend there were <br />only two patrol cars in the parking lot. <br /> <br /> This has been an emotional issue for the neighborhood as well as the owners and patrons <br />of the club and has caused the police department to be present to make certain things are under <br />control. He believed it was inaccurate to say this club consistently taxed the police services. <br />Contrary to representations made by staff, efforts have been made by Mr. Ratinho to consistently <br />address complaints brought to them. Security was increased in January after the first letter was <br />received. The club did not hear any complaints that required any additional addressing until <br />May, when it received another letter. The club security is constantly in touch with the Police <br />Department and when things were mentioned informally, they responded. In May, security was <br />increased again and portions of the parking lot were coned off to deal with some of the <br />dispersement issues. He did not believe the owner has been unresponsive. <br /> <br /> He believed that this all comes down to fairness. He assumed Council has read all his <br />correspondence and he will not repeat that. <br /> <br /> This problem really began in May and after only three months, the owners find <br />themselves facing a revocation of their permit. The Marque asks for a chance to make changes <br />in response to the complaints. The Masse's problem lasted a year and a half. The fact that there <br />are no neighbors to make complaints does not make the problem less serious. In fact, it was <br />more serious in that case. The main issue here is noise and the compatibility of this club to the <br />surrounding area. <br /> <br /> He felt the decision had already been made that it could be compatible by the issuance of <br />the conditional use permit and the zoning of the area. He felt it would be an abuse of discretion <br />for Council to now say that this is not a compatible use. There is a noise ordinance in Pleasanton <br />and the club is in compliance with that ordinance. The sound emanating from the premises is <br />less than 60 dB. A sound study was conducted by Wilson Erick and Associates to substantiate <br />this and he presented copies to Council. He said staff has not seen this because he only received <br />it at 5:30 p.m. today. Matthew Golden was available to answer questions. The study was done <br />Saturday night between midnight and two o'clock. The conclusions were that the level of the <br />Marque was below the 50 dB. The conclusion was there was more noise coming from the six <br />lane Hopyard Road than from the parking lot itself. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 8 09/03/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />