CCMIN050702 - Laserfiche WebLink

Steve Brozosky, 1700 Vineyard Avenue, said the signature collection phase of the Bemal initiative seems to have brought out the worst in some people. There have been many articles and comments that insinuate that those who started the initiative do not care about the community and are insensitive people. It is sad to see such name calling. He hoped the election campaign will deal with real issues and not negative campaigning or attempts to make caring members of the community feel guilty. He felt that those calling him uncompassionate and mean spirited have no idea how much the proponents of the initiative do for the community. He and Brian Arkin spend countless hours serving the community. Mr. Arkin has consistently supported affordable housing while serving on the Planning Commission. Mr. Brozosky said he spends a lot of time volunteering at his daughter's school and working with the 4H Club program, including finding leadership and community service programs. He provides space on his property for the 4H Club members to raise their animals. He said volunteers have obtained almost 4,700 signatures to put the initiative on the ballot and that shows a lot of support. Council cannot ignore this if they truly represent the total population of Pleasanton. Council has chosen to reconsider what it puts on the ballot and he hoped the language will not be too conflicting or confusing to the community. Housing on this property has always been an issue and a majority of the Council has done what it can to keep the housing numbers down while fulfilling the needs of the community. One recent development plan for the Bernal property had 500 units with all the low-income units in apartments. The Planning and Housing Commissions asked the developer to increase the amount of affbrdable housing and to not put all affordable units in the apartments. The City gave the developers more of the Bernal property to accomplish this goal and there are now 581 units with 15% affordable and 182 units which can have secondary units, which will also help the affurdability issues in the City. Pteasanton's inclusionary housing where low income units are mixed in with market rate units is a good policy for those in need and for the whole community. The Busch property has a proposed six acres for senior housing including affordable units. He felt the community was addressing those in need. On the issue of affordably priced housing as opposed to low income housing, most houses constructed in Pleasanton over the past several years have been very large houses. He felt the emphasis should be shifted to build more smaller homes so teachers, police and fire personnel can afford to live in the community. We need to continue to address the housing issues of the City but we also have an obligation to those currently living here to keep the City special. Concessions have been made on the Bemal property with the amount of housing approved. The rest of the land should remain in public use. We do not have over a thousand acres of useable land as in Golden Gate Park, but the Bernal property can be a place to take our families and guests to show our pride in Pleasanton. The initiative was written in a way that if the City feels there is a housing need in the City that only this property can address, all it takes is a vote of the people to put it on there. Brian Arkin, 3740 Newton Way, recalled a joint workshop on June 27, 2000 at which Greenbriar presented its proposal to the Council, Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission and Housing Commission. The proposal was for 500 units, 425 market rate, three acres for 75 affordable apartment units; and 745,000 sq. ft. of office space. Approximately 365 acres were to become city-owned for public facilities. That was forty acres or 13.2% more than the City has today. Greenbriar was told the proposal was not acceptable because the City did not want 75 units of affordable housing in a single apartment building. The City also wanted affordable homes for purchase. Greenbriar was requested to increase the number and quality of affordable units. He felt the City is a caring community that wants to provide high quality Pleasanton City Council 11 05/07/02 Minutes