My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN041602
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCMIN041602
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:35 AM
Creation date
8/8/2002 8:04:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2002
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN041602
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
referred to the fully improved trails, with a ten foot graded area and ten foot asphalt, plus a six <br />foot granite area is quoted as $70-78 per linear foot. That makes the estimate at $65 million. As <br />you look at the list of trails, he felt the estimates were o£fby a lot. <br /> <br /> Dolores Bengtson, 568 Hamilton Way, supported the Trails Master Plan and urged <br />Council to approve it. She suggested one small addition to include the piece of the former <br />Southern Pacific Railroad Transportation Corridor between Bernal and Junipero to the number 4 <br />priority to assure the Ridge View Commons residents and others in that area can enjoy a direct <br />route to the downtown. Staff has worked long and hard to bring this to Council and she <br />appreciated their efforts to insure that everyone has had the opportunity to gather information to <br />prepare for meetings. As evidenced by earlier testimony, trail users of the entire area are aware <br />of the Trails Master Plan review taking place and support the efforts of the City to complete this <br />trail system. Pleasanton is a critical link to the regional trail system and she felt it should be the <br />strongest, not the weakest, link. She submitted two pages of signatures of regional trail users <br />who support this Master Plan. There is a local issue on one trail, but the entire trail system is <br />important regionally. Everyone appears to support the trails, with only one problem with the <br />residents of the Parkside area. Two concerns of that neighborhood seem to be safety and <br />property value. She felt the third concern, loss of privacy, can be addressed directly by them as <br />other homeowners have done. Put up a fence or plant a tree as they choose. This should be <br />handled by them and funded by them. In July and August, 2001, in the spirit of sharing any <br />information she had regarding safety and property values as it relates to trails, she provided <br />Karen Ellgas copies of four regional trail studies. She related the titles of those studies. All the <br />data support the fact that compared to the incidents in other parts of cities, trails have an <br />excellent record of public safety. With regard to property values, she quoted from one study that <br />indicated "property near but not immediately adjacent to the Bert Gilman Trail is significantly <br />easier to sell and according to real estate agents sells for an average of 6% more as a result of its <br />proximity to the trail. Property immediately adjacent to the trail, however, is only slightly easier <br />to sell and sells for zero to one-half of one percent more. Residents who bought their home after <br />the trail was open are most likely to view the trails as a positive factor that increases the value of <br />their home. Long time residents who bought their homes prior to opening of the trails are <br />generally less likely to view the trails as an economic asset." She thanked Council for its time <br />and consideration. <br /> <br />There were no further speakers and the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico indicated he would like to first have a motion to approve the staff <br />recommendation; second to discuss the mitigations for the Parkside residents; and third to <br />entertain any modifications to the plan that Council might propose. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Michelotti, seconded by Mr. Campbell, to adopt Resolution No. <br />02-037, approving the revised six priority trail segments described in the staff report; <br />proceed to open trails immediately, with or without paving; continue the Arroyo Mocho <br />Trail on the south side, from Hopyard Road east to the City limits; and designate a Trails <br />Committee as a permanent committee of the Parks and Recreation Commission. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 23 04/16/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.